Probably the most important thing to come out of this last weekend was the origin story. It turns out that there was once a beloved Irish math teacher at Bronx Science who spent all his spare time doing inappropriate things with his cellphone. To honor his memory (he was kicked off the faculty after being tarred and feathered, and was last seen working on Todd Akin’s reelection campaign), they named the double-octos round after him. And now you know the true story of Sext O’Decimals.
Anyhow, what you really want are the details. I got there early on Friday. Parking was atrocious, and I drove around forever, and finally found a spot on Staten Island. So it goes. At least it wasn’t pouring out at that point, as it was later, forcing people to arrive looking like the proverbial wet dogs. I sat at the registration table, and I had two jobs. First, I told people to move along down the table to someone else and stop bothering me, and second, I took all the changes and either entered them into tabroom (IEs and Policy, which O’C repeatedly and confusingly refers to as Team Debate, as if PF doesn’t exist), piled them into a neat stack of papers (PF) or put them into tabroom (LD). Then I trucked up to my great new tabroom, which put Grand Central Terminal to shame with all the noise and confusion of twenty-seven other tabbers jabbering and runners runnering confusedly and Brx Sci teachers with thick accents looking belligerent and swearing at us under their breath in their native languages. Bietz and I found different digs pretty quickly, the room I will henceforth refer to as the Menick Cave, and which will be the LD home henceforth and forever. Occasionally people would pop by and eat their hearts out, so you know it was the right choice.
Before heading off to Pupsville for the weekend, CP showed me how to use the new automated online system in tabroom for postings and emailing and whatnot. Five minutes later I was trying to demo it to everyone else, with mixed results. It turned out that there was one serious bug in the system with flights, that if you were in one flight, your alert told you you were in the other flight. The postings were also backwards from TRPC, so there was a little confusion there, easily fixed when you just alerted everyone to the problem and told them to stay calm and carry on, which they did. CP looked at the data and came back with the sage response that it was all screwed up, blaming sunspots and the Curse of the Bambino. It should be cleared up for the next tournament, he said, whatever that means, given that there’s a tournament every weekend. Of course, for it to really work, people need to get themselves connected to tabroom, students and judges both, and that will take a little time. But it is a great system, and we used the Goy equivalent at NDCA in Vegas with great success. Of course, at Bronx, there was Wifi access granted to the hearty of spirit (getting access was about as easy as cloning three-headed sheep), but once it was there, it was there. A lot of other schools won’t be so easy, including Sailorville. So be it.
There seemed to be a new bug in the transfer of MJP from tabroom to TRPC, one that affected only schools with lots of conflicts. We had set up MJP for 6 categories, 5 of them real and 6 a strike, with conflicts on the side. I’m not sure exactly what the problem was, but it seems that if you had too many conflicts, some of your strikes got lost. We ran a check of 25% of the teams and found no discrepancies, at which point we accepted the reality of statistics, so it only affected a tiny number of teams, but still, you don’t want that sort of thing to happen. So, over to CP, who sounds sanguine about fixing it easily. I also asked him for pref screens to stay live in tabroom after closing so that people can easily look at their prefs after they’re entered; most of people telling me something was wrong over the weekend with their prefs was their bad memory of whom they had ranked what, not anything wrong with the system, and this would solve that. It would help tab too, as now I have to dive into a very unwieldy text file to pull the original information. Of course, the real problem with a pref not taking is that everyone suddenly becomes suspicious of the prefs. This being the third year I’ve been doing MJP, with absolutely no pref issues, I find this rather paranoid of people, but then again, paranoia plays much better than confidence, so there you are. If there was a problem, there must be a million problems screwing over me and my teams, is a much easier concept to go with then that, if there was a problem, it was probably some minor thing that is under control and won’t affect anyone. The trouble with human nature is that so many humans seem to fall in line with it.
After that, the chief issue seemed to be people’s inability to look up the word mutual in the dictionary. MJP does not mean you always get your 1s. MJP means that you and your opponent always get a judge you’ve preffed identically. This could mean a 5-5 round, but needless to say, aside from a handful of 3-3s in prelims for down-and-outs, it was all better than that and, in fact, overwhelmingly 1-1. But in elims, it gets dicier, because as a general rule the teams that make it into elims have complicated druidical structures for preffing the judges that inevitably never gel with their opponents’ complicated druidical structures, and more than once I had to show people that they weren’t getting their 1s because they and their opponent had no mutual 1s to get. And often no mutual 2s. You’ve got to do the math, people. I don’t have some cache of 1s that I’m holding back on, although that’s what people seem to think. It’s like with my wife, who is a real estate agent. New customers always think, when she shows them around the first few times, that she’s holding back on the good houses in their price range, the ones that they would buy immediately. Can you say counterintuitive?
There is a dicier side to MJP in elims, where you simply get things to add up. The way this works is that, when there is little mutuality (which happens usually in one or two of the pairings of any elim round), you’ll put in a mutual, like a 2-2, and then a 1-2 and and 2-1, or maybe it will be a 1-1, a 2-3 and a 3-2. Obviously this is not your dream panel, but if you want a dream panel of all 1s, sleep with your opponent prior to prefs and dream together of the same people. Short of that, the math talks.
What I don’t like is when the math is, say, 1-5, 3-1, 3-1 or something along those lines. It adds up to 7-7, but is obviously biased toward the 5-1-1. The only time this ever happened and was uncorrectable was one year at Lex, but we were able to postpone the final to the next day at the RR, where we were able to put in an even panel because we had a lot more judges back in play. We almost ended up with a scenario like that this weekend, but a saintly couple of volunteers allowed us to set up a final panel that had not necessarily high prefs but a balance of this way, that way and neutral. Since the tournament concluded with a 3-0, at some point you just throw up your hands and say, go in and win those judges.
Three years ago, there were no prefs, and people debated in front of the panels they were given, excluding their strikes. As possibly the biggest proponent of MJP on the planet, I will not long for the good old days, and will simply continue to explain and explain and explain until the realities take seed. I am not actively working against your teams. I do not care about your teams. I barely care about my own teams. What I care about is getting out as quickly as possible, and the only way to make that happen is with the best prefs possible for the tournament. But best prefs possible is not the same as you get all your 1s; it’s you get all your best mutual judge preferences. Which is why we call it Mutual Judge Preferences and not Pick Your Own Judge. There’s a big difference there.
So it goes.
Monday, October 22, 2012
Debate: The bubble
I've had this conversation with my students a number of times, and felt ramifications of it over the weekend when a bunch of us were gabbing about various political and social issues with a collection of the usual tree-hugging suspects and one staunch conservative. Point number one, the world is not the way you think it is, filled with two kinds of people: 1) smart people and 2) people who disagree with your politics. Secondly, religion is important, even if you profess not to believe in one. As a matter of fact, for believers, it is by its very nature preemptive of all other concerns. The presumption is for God.
In other words, we are living in a real place called America, and just happen to have a tiny bubble called debate. And even in that bubble, there are a lot of Americans. This Gallup poll underlines that broader distinction.
In other words, we are living in a real place called America, and just happen to have a tiny bubble called debate. And even in that bubble, there are a lot of Americans. This Gallup poll underlines that broader distinction.
Friday, October 19, 2012
Coachean Feed: Gandhi, gay eagles, assisted suicide, and a pot pourri of the Middle East for November
- In the northeast we have the Modest Novice topic, the same topic every year for first-timers, on civil disobedience. Add to that, I really strongly endorse Philosophy Bites (the latter word not acting as a verb in this case), and why wouldn't I post Richard Sorabji on Mahatma Gandhi as Philosopher?
- I don't like not liking the Boy Scouts, but I don't know how I can. Gay Boy Scout denied his Eagle Scout award
- If assisted suicide ever comes back as a topic: Study Suggests Legal Assisted Suicide Doesn’t Increase Death Wish
- What the Vikings Can Teach Us About Terrorism. We like to think that instability and want lead to terrorism. Maybe not.
- They're baaaaack! Good article for PF November, bad article for life in general: Al-Qaeda’s Resurgence.
- Where the Arab Spring Has Not Yet Sprung Probably not bad to have this under your belt.
- Don't Assume Iran Is the Greatest Threat Well, yes and no. Pakistan and Syria (and some non-ME countries).
- If I were arguing November PF, I'd be looking at these guys: Israel vs Iran: clash of the pariah states
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Les Temps Perdu: A Teacher
I get the alumni bulletin from my high school, and I sort of breeze through it just to see if there’s any pictures of people I know who have aged dramatically while I have remained my winsome boyish self. When the latest edition arrived this week, I learned that the most influential teacher in my life had passed away. He was well along in years, and to be honest, when I learned not long ago that he was still alive I was quite surprised. Still, to now see him unequivocally gone stopped me in my tracks. I am here most likely because he was there.
I was always a reader, from as far back as I can remember. Like any reader, certain milestones and rituals stick out. The library loomed large, in an era before there was such a thing as young adult books, or perhaps more precisely, before there was such a thing as young adult books that you would want to read. Until a certain age, to wit, until the end of sixth grade, one was limited to the children’s section. However, if one could demonstrate otherwise, one was granted limited access to the adult section. You could only take out two books at a time, and the librarians studied them carefully to make sure you hadn’t snuck in a Fanny Hill or whatever (or at least I guess that’s what they were looking for). I gravitated first to mysteries and then to science fiction, because they were the easiest sections in the adult area to figure out. And the books, of course, were perfect, and I was on my way.
Book sections in department stores (imagine that!) also loomed large. My parents would go shopping and drop me off in the book section for as long as whatever they were doing took, and pick me up at the end of it. I didn’t necessarily buy books. As much as anything, these were exploratory sessions. One looked at the wealth of books available, and began to get a sense of which ones were classics and which ones were popular and who was who and what was what. It was a way to anchor oneself in that particular world, mixing new and old, getting a feel for all of it. A similar experience later on, during my high school years, was the occasional visit to the bookstores in Grand Central. Beyond the exterior lure of the latest bestsellers, these were mostly stocked with arty, intellectual books that befit Manhattan and a big city intelligentsia. You would see covers of so-called underground classics and City Lights poetry collections and the like. Another learning experience.
While this was all in my background, I was as a youth poised for something vaguely referred to as an engineering career, because I scored through the roof in math. It wasn’t that I was shabby on the language side, but when the balance tilted one way rather than the other in what was obviously pure instinctive aptitude, one went down the obvious path. In high school, where the curriculum inviolably split students into either the language path or the science path, I was set for life on the science path. I did continue to excel in math, but quite honestly, the various sciences courses were my worst. Whatever aptitude I had for numbers did not extend into plant cells, rock formations or the periodic table of the elements.
I had Bernie McMahon as a teacher twice. The first time, it was for my regular English class, if I remember correctly as a sophomore. He was smart and funny and all that, one of my favorite teachers, but that was it. I had other good teachers too, and he was just one of them. Then senior year came around. Back then there were not a lot of AP classes. Our school offered exactly two, math and English. Math was calculus, our first exposure to this precise math of imprecision, and it was the first time in my life math and I did not get along. After a month of proving definitively that there were certain sorts of logic that my brain did not find logical, I somehow managed without penalty to switch from AP Math to AP English. Father McMahon (he was a priest, Bernard McMahon, and the nickname Bernie was as unlikely and as perfect as can be) taught the AP class. And this was where he was not simply a good teacher, he was a magician. He turned me (and many others—he was a school legend) into something totally different from what I had been before. He helped me find my real calling in life, i.e., books. Writing. Publishing. The whole thing. I had only thought of books before this as entertainment on the side. Bernie McMahon turned them into my life.
He talked about books and writers with reverence, but more than that, he treated his students' interest in books and writers with reverence. He let us write ourselves, and, for instance, created dozens of little T.S. Eliots, first by teaching us about Eliot in such a way that we saw him as a god of literature, and then by encouraging us to stimulate our own inner Eliots. Never has so much bad poetry come from the pens of adolescents as when Bernie McMahon was standing behind them, encouraging them to explore and dream. He cracked novels in such a way that we didn’t look at them from some academic theme/plot paradigm, but as living, breathing organisms created by living, breathing organisms. We took from them whatever we could, not some set body of dull approved ideas. And then we were encouraged to look at books not in the curriculum the same way, and attempt to learn from them as well. I was on a real Lewis Carroll binge in those days, and Bernie McMahon encouraged me to go as far in that direction as I wanted, rather than telling me that Alice was not on the reading list and that I should stick instead to Sir Walter Scott, who was. (Someday I will read Scott, I promise. But only when I’m ready. That would be the Bernie McMahon way of handling it.)
Father McMahon also taught at the College of New Rochelle, but I’m not sure how much or what. When I knew him he was deeply into admiration of Anais Nin—now that’s my kind of priest! I loved being with this guy, talking informally about what I was reading, or what he was reading, or what any of a small coterie of his other followers (and this guy had followers, nay acolytes) was reading. No other teacher I had so encouraged our minds both to go their own way and yet to follow the ways of those who had gone before. In the end, in me, he made final the switch of track, so that when I went to college I did nothing but the humanities, with the barest minimum of math and science. In fact, the only math course I remember, I also remember never attending, showing up only for the final, on the assumption (correct) that I could pass it easily (it was not a calculus course). Interestingly enough, all those cut classes had an effect on me, and I do, and this is true, occasionally dream that I should be in that class and I’m not, and my world is about to end because of it. It is a classic nightmare, the last lingering vestiges of my life in the world of math.
So Father Bernard McMahon got me not into books but realizing that books were where I was supposed to be. Forty years plus of a career in publishing, with a couple of published books of my own under my belt, is the end result.
My most fervent wish is that everyone in high school find a teacher like that, a teacher who doesn’t just show you things you don’t know about the world, but things you don’t know about yourself. R.I.P. Father McMahon.
I was always a reader, from as far back as I can remember. Like any reader, certain milestones and rituals stick out. The library loomed large, in an era before there was such a thing as young adult books, or perhaps more precisely, before there was such a thing as young adult books that you would want to read. Until a certain age, to wit, until the end of sixth grade, one was limited to the children’s section. However, if one could demonstrate otherwise, one was granted limited access to the adult section. You could only take out two books at a time, and the librarians studied them carefully to make sure you hadn’t snuck in a Fanny Hill or whatever (or at least I guess that’s what they were looking for). I gravitated first to mysteries and then to science fiction, because they were the easiest sections in the adult area to figure out. And the books, of course, were perfect, and I was on my way.
Book sections in department stores (imagine that!) also loomed large. My parents would go shopping and drop me off in the book section for as long as whatever they were doing took, and pick me up at the end of it. I didn’t necessarily buy books. As much as anything, these were exploratory sessions. One looked at the wealth of books available, and began to get a sense of which ones were classics and which ones were popular and who was who and what was what. It was a way to anchor oneself in that particular world, mixing new and old, getting a feel for all of it. A similar experience later on, during my high school years, was the occasional visit to the bookstores in Grand Central. Beyond the exterior lure of the latest bestsellers, these were mostly stocked with arty, intellectual books that befit Manhattan and a big city intelligentsia. You would see covers of so-called underground classics and City Lights poetry collections and the like. Another learning experience.
While this was all in my background, I was as a youth poised for something vaguely referred to as an engineering career, because I scored through the roof in math. It wasn’t that I was shabby on the language side, but when the balance tilted one way rather than the other in what was obviously pure instinctive aptitude, one went down the obvious path. In high school, where the curriculum inviolably split students into either the language path or the science path, I was set for life on the science path. I did continue to excel in math, but quite honestly, the various sciences courses were my worst. Whatever aptitude I had for numbers did not extend into plant cells, rock formations or the periodic table of the elements.
I had Bernie McMahon as a teacher twice. The first time, it was for my regular English class, if I remember correctly as a sophomore. He was smart and funny and all that, one of my favorite teachers, but that was it. I had other good teachers too, and he was just one of them. Then senior year came around. Back then there were not a lot of AP classes. Our school offered exactly two, math and English. Math was calculus, our first exposure to this precise math of imprecision, and it was the first time in my life math and I did not get along. After a month of proving definitively that there were certain sorts of logic that my brain did not find logical, I somehow managed without penalty to switch from AP Math to AP English. Father McMahon (he was a priest, Bernard McMahon, and the nickname Bernie was as unlikely and as perfect as can be) taught the AP class. And this was where he was not simply a good teacher, he was a magician. He turned me (and many others—he was a school legend) into something totally different from what I had been before. He helped me find my real calling in life, i.e., books. Writing. Publishing. The whole thing. I had only thought of books before this as entertainment on the side. Bernie McMahon turned them into my life.
He talked about books and writers with reverence, but more than that, he treated his students' interest in books and writers with reverence. He let us write ourselves, and, for instance, created dozens of little T.S. Eliots, first by teaching us about Eliot in such a way that we saw him as a god of literature, and then by encouraging us to stimulate our own inner Eliots. Never has so much bad poetry come from the pens of adolescents as when Bernie McMahon was standing behind them, encouraging them to explore and dream. He cracked novels in such a way that we didn’t look at them from some academic theme/plot paradigm, but as living, breathing organisms created by living, breathing organisms. We took from them whatever we could, not some set body of dull approved ideas. And then we were encouraged to look at books not in the curriculum the same way, and attempt to learn from them as well. I was on a real Lewis Carroll binge in those days, and Bernie McMahon encouraged me to go as far in that direction as I wanted, rather than telling me that Alice was not on the reading list and that I should stick instead to Sir Walter Scott, who was. (Someday I will read Scott, I promise. But only when I’m ready. That would be the Bernie McMahon way of handling it.)
Father McMahon also taught at the College of New Rochelle, but I’m not sure how much or what. When I knew him he was deeply into admiration of Anais Nin—now that’s my kind of priest! I loved being with this guy, talking informally about what I was reading, or what he was reading, or what any of a small coterie of his other followers (and this guy had followers, nay acolytes) was reading. No other teacher I had so encouraged our minds both to go their own way and yet to follow the ways of those who had gone before. In the end, in me, he made final the switch of track, so that when I went to college I did nothing but the humanities, with the barest minimum of math and science. In fact, the only math course I remember, I also remember never attending, showing up only for the final, on the assumption (correct) that I could pass it easily (it was not a calculus course). Interestingly enough, all those cut classes had an effect on me, and I do, and this is true, occasionally dream that I should be in that class and I’m not, and my world is about to end because of it. It is a classic nightmare, the last lingering vestiges of my life in the world of math.
So Father Bernard McMahon got me not into books but realizing that books were where I was supposed to be. Forty years plus of a career in publishing, with a couple of published books of my own under my belt, is the end result.
My most fervent wish is that everyone in high school find a teacher like that, a teacher who doesn’t just show you things you don’t know about the world, but things you don’t know about yourself. R.I.P. Father McMahon.
Debate: Updated Schedule for Fairly Large Bronx So-Called-Invitational Tournament, LD Division
Schedule for Lincoln-Douglas Debate
(Schedules for Legislative Debate, Public Forum Debate, Policy Debate, Humorous Interpretation Debate, Duo Interpretation Debate, and anything else you can put the word Debate after, are somewhere else, but you didn't care anyhow.)
Friday, October 19, 2012
6:00 AM — Wake up to Justin Bieber on clock radio alarm and realize that there’s another &$@*# tournament this weekend. Throw clock radio out the window, but still hear music, then realize that in fact you were sleeping with Justin Bieber, who is now propped up on his pillows strumming a ukulele. Pop out of bed immediately and hate yourself for the rest of your life.
11:30 AM – 1:00 PM — Registration (in-person registration is required; no masks, please, and leave the Beeb at home)
1:30 PM — Opening Remarks and Ceremony, including the Induction of New Hall of Foam Programs, Presentation of the Goombah of the Year Award, and Presentation of the Bronx Underachievement Awards. As this is just the first of many award ceremonies, moaning loudly throughout is mandatory. Please note that this year there will NOT be an award ceremony after every round. There will, however, be an award ceremony in every room DURING every round, probably around the 1AR in each flight. Extra time will be added to this speech to account for the interruption.
3:15 PM — The Anyone Who Works for the Bronx Now Gets to Pretend They Went There Round (double-flighted)
5:15 PM — The Our Bus is on the Wrong Side of the Hudson But We’ll be There by the Second Round (double-flighted)
6:00 PM — The Ilene Dunay Foods of the World, Unite! (You have nothing to lose but your lunch) Dinner Break
8:00 PM — The Bronx Benny NSFW Round (private joke—pun intended—double-flighted)
Students being housed by host families on Friday night will be picked up in the East Gym following Round III. Housing families will drive into the gym through the north entrance; we ask that students keep a weather eye pealed so as not to be run down by an SUV in front of the concession stand.
Saturday, October 20, 2012
8:00 AM — The Things Were a Lot Easier Back Before We Got this Bloody Octas Bid Round (double-flighted)
11:15 — The Coachean Life Tribute Bathroom Break. Debaters must wash hands after using. Judges must wash everything else.
11:00 AM — The Roman Numerals Were on the Real Schedule if You Weren’t Sure of the Level of Pretentiousness Round (double-flighted)
2:00 PM — The What? Another Round? Round (double-flighted)
5:00 PM — The Holy Mother of Pearl, Yet Another Round Round (double-flighted)
7:15 PM — Presentation of Superior Speaker Awards (the phrase Superior Speaker Awards is funnier than anything I could come up with) in Lincoln-Douglas Debate and of the Peter Colavito Award
Students who were housed Friday night who actually came back on Saturday morning will no doubt prefer to hide in the basement until the threat of housing again is over. Postings for the elimination rounds will be available online at Tabroom.com on Saturday night, but only if Menick gets a decent meal somewhere, otherwise he’ll just grouch and post some stupid joke thing, because let’s face it, everybody already knows how they’re doing so what’s the big mystery?
Sunday, October 21, 2012
8:00 AM — Snooze-off Round (if necessary)
9:15 AM — Sext Your Decimo Round (double-flighted and highly illegal)
11:30 AM — The "This Space Vacant" Round, to be named after the most important debate dignitary to show up for the weekend
1:00 PM — The What Happened to Lunch? Round
2:15 PM — The Will the Eponymous Matt Dunay be Struck Again From the Semifinal Debates
3:30 PM — The Hee-Sun Hong Championship Debate and Chowder Tasting
immediately followed by the Presentation of Richard B. Sodikow to the winning debater
(Schedules for Legislative Debate, Public Forum Debate, Policy Debate, Humorous Interpretation Debate, Duo Interpretation Debate, and anything else you can put the word Debate after, are somewhere else, but you didn't care anyhow.)
Friday, October 19, 2012
6:00 AM — Wake up to Justin Bieber on clock radio alarm and realize that there’s another &$@*# tournament this weekend. Throw clock radio out the window, but still hear music, then realize that in fact you were sleeping with Justin Bieber, who is now propped up on his pillows strumming a ukulele. Pop out of bed immediately and hate yourself for the rest of your life.
11:30 AM – 1:00 PM — Registration (in-person registration is required; no masks, please, and leave the Beeb at home)
1:30 PM — Opening Remarks and Ceremony, including the Induction of New Hall of Foam Programs, Presentation of the Goombah of the Year Award, and Presentation of the Bronx Underachievement Awards. As this is just the first of many award ceremonies, moaning loudly throughout is mandatory. Please note that this year there will NOT be an award ceremony after every round. There will, however, be an award ceremony in every room DURING every round, probably around the 1AR in each flight. Extra time will be added to this speech to account for the interruption.
3:15 PM — The Anyone Who Works for the Bronx Now Gets to Pretend They Went There Round (double-flighted)
5:15 PM — The Our Bus is on the Wrong Side of the Hudson But We’ll be There by the Second Round (double-flighted)
6:00 PM — The Ilene Dunay Foods of the World, Unite! (You have nothing to lose but your lunch) Dinner Break
8:00 PM — The Bronx Benny NSFW Round (private joke—pun intended—double-flighted)
Students being housed by host families on Friday night will be picked up in the East Gym following Round III. Housing families will drive into the gym through the north entrance; we ask that students keep a weather eye pealed so as not to be run down by an SUV in front of the concession stand.
Saturday, October 20, 2012
8:00 AM — The Things Were a Lot Easier Back Before We Got this Bloody Octas Bid Round (double-flighted)
11:15 — The Coachean Life Tribute Bathroom Break. Debaters must wash hands after using. Judges must wash everything else.
11:00 AM — The Roman Numerals Were on the Real Schedule if You Weren’t Sure of the Level of Pretentiousness Round (double-flighted)
2:00 PM — The What? Another Round? Round (double-flighted)
5:00 PM — The Holy Mother of Pearl, Yet Another Round Round (double-flighted)
7:15 PM — Presentation of Superior Speaker Awards (the phrase Superior Speaker Awards is funnier than anything I could come up with) in Lincoln-Douglas Debate and of the Peter Colavito Award
Students who were housed Friday night who actually came back on Saturday morning will no doubt prefer to hide in the basement until the threat of housing again is over. Postings for the elimination rounds will be available online at Tabroom.com on Saturday night, but only if Menick gets a decent meal somewhere, otherwise he’ll just grouch and post some stupid joke thing, because let’s face it, everybody already knows how they’re doing so what’s the big mystery?
Sunday, October 21, 2012
8:00 AM — Snooze-off Round (if necessary)
9:15 AM — Sext Your Decimo Round (double-flighted and highly illegal)
11:30 AM — The "This Space Vacant" Round, to be named after the most important debate dignitary to show up for the weekend
1:00 PM — The What Happened to Lunch? Round
2:15 PM — The Will the Eponymous Matt Dunay be Struck Again From the Semifinal Debates
3:30 PM — The Hee-Sun Hong Championship Debate and Chowder Tasting
immediately followed by the Presentation of Richard B. Sodikow to the winning debater
More articles we didn't finish reading
These headlines are all real, directly copied from our RSS feed without editing. When we say we didn't read them, we mean it. They didn't exactly pull us in, for some reason...
- The First-Ever World Champion Squirrel Cook Off
- Jennifer Aniston Launches Hair Care Line
- How to Make Corn Dog Brownies
- Review: 'Atlas Shrugged Part II: The Strike' is blandly mediocre
- Americans Are Getting Drunker and Fatter
- Honey Boo Boo endorses Barack Obama on 'Jimmy Kimmel Live'
BIrthday: Chuck Berry
Charles Edward Anderson Berry, who as every knows borrowed his unique style of playing from Marty McFly in Back to the Future, was born on this date in 1926. Here's some really sharp old footage:
Berry notoriously spent his career with various pickup bands. Occasionally those bands would amount to something on their own.
I don't know which is more awesome, Keith in the suit or Chuck doing the dance.
This one especially captures the span of Chuck's appeal.
Hail, hail, rock and roll. Hail, hail, Chuck Berry.
Berry notoriously spent his career with various pickup bands. Occasionally those bands would amount to something on their own.
I don't know which is more awesome, Keith in the suit or Chuck doing the dance.
This one especially captures the span of Chuck's appeal.
Hail, hail, rock and roll. Hail, hail, Chuck Berry.
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Debate: We meet, therefore we are, but we really aren't
Starting friction is greater than moving friction. This seems to especially hold true with the Sailors’ latest plebes. So far one of them has debated, at the appropriately named First Timers’ event, and that seems to conclude our program for the season. No one is signed up for anything else, because of a variety of life events ranging from christenings to confirmations to bar mitzvahs to pon farrs. I absolutely do not recall any group of novices being so bloodily busy doing something else other than being novices. My fear is that the great train of debate, which has already left the station, may be moving too fast for them by the time they decide to hop on.
Sigh...
Last night, in addition to covering the fact that there are tournaments and debaters, and the latter sort of need the former to maintain their distinction as the latter, we talked about justice, which wraps up the basic novice curriculum of Big Ideas (the others being rights, social contract and morality). I’ve simplified and organized the BIs nicely, I think, and cut out a lot of the unnecessary or hifalutin stuff that one tends to accrue over time. Stick to the basics when training plebes on stuff for the first time. We’ll get more into debate per se going forward, although that’s hard to do if none of them have ever even seen a debate!
Regarding that sigh above: Rinse. Repeat.
We also talked about the November PF topic. This is a poser because of its breadth. It’s easy enough to conquer the idea of US foreign policy: just go to the White House site and read it, given that that’s what the executive branch mostly does for a living. Threatening national security can be very broadly defined down to a single individual in jeopardy, but honestly, the links from Middle East – Instability – Terrorists – Threat to NS is pretty straightforward and unquestionably strong, especially insofar as much of our FP is in aid of maintaining stability. The real question is, how to argue it, thanks to the impossibly broadness of Middle East, regardless of how narrow one attempts to define that term. One could take a philosophical high ground approach and skip examples, but that’s not terribly convincing. Yet when one picks examples, they can be quickly mooted by counterexamples demonstrating the exact opposite, not in a line that will lead to debate clash, but in parallel lines leading to debate ships passing in the night. Once again, the wording of a resolution, where the bottom line is solid, derails the possibility of many good rounds. If it were any one country, rather than Middle East, it would be improved dramatically. By making it so broad (even if one uses the narrowest definition of Middle East), it is, literally and figuratively, all over the map.
Here’s my proposal. Let whoever comes up with resolutions come up with resolutions. Then lock them into a room with 10 high school sophomores and have them brainstorm for an hour. Then unlock the room and have them rewrite the resolution so that people can actually argue it well on both sides. Too often, the resolutions are about good topic areas, but written in a way that causes them to self-destruct.
Back to that sigh: Rinse and repeat yet again. And again. And again…
Sigh...
Last night, in addition to covering the fact that there are tournaments and debaters, and the latter sort of need the former to maintain their distinction as the latter, we talked about justice, which wraps up the basic novice curriculum of Big Ideas (the others being rights, social contract and morality). I’ve simplified and organized the BIs nicely, I think, and cut out a lot of the unnecessary or hifalutin stuff that one tends to accrue over time. Stick to the basics when training plebes on stuff for the first time. We’ll get more into debate per se going forward, although that’s hard to do if none of them have ever even seen a debate!
Regarding that sigh above: Rinse. Repeat.
We also talked about the November PF topic. This is a poser because of its breadth. It’s easy enough to conquer the idea of US foreign policy: just go to the White House site and read it, given that that’s what the executive branch mostly does for a living. Threatening national security can be very broadly defined down to a single individual in jeopardy, but honestly, the links from Middle East – Instability – Terrorists – Threat to NS is pretty straightforward and unquestionably strong, especially insofar as much of our FP is in aid of maintaining stability. The real question is, how to argue it, thanks to the impossibly broadness of Middle East, regardless of how narrow one attempts to define that term. One could take a philosophical high ground approach and skip examples, but that’s not terribly convincing. Yet when one picks examples, they can be quickly mooted by counterexamples demonstrating the exact opposite, not in a line that will lead to debate clash, but in parallel lines leading to debate ships passing in the night. Once again, the wording of a resolution, where the bottom line is solid, derails the possibility of many good rounds. If it were any one country, rather than Middle East, it would be improved dramatically. By making it so broad (even if one uses the narrowest definition of Middle East), it is, literally and figuratively, all over the map.
Here’s my proposal. Let whoever comes up with resolutions come up with resolutions. Then lock them into a room with 10 high school sophomores and have them brainstorm for an hour. Then unlock the room and have them rewrite the resolution so that people can actually argue it well on both sides. Too often, the resolutions are about good topic areas, but written in a way that causes them to self-destruct.
Back to that sigh: Rinse and repeat yet again. And again. And again…
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Debate: Mostly Jake
We had the first Speech Workshop of the season at the chez last night. As always, this was a very useful event. I watched two of our seniors, our Coca Ptains, do their DIs, and was very impressed. The point of these sessions is, of course, to break down what they’re doing point by point, but they didn’t need a lot from us. A little strategy here, a little nudge there, that sort of thing. We’ll have another in a couple of weeks to help out some more people. While we were at it, we discussed Speecho-Americanism as practiced by the Sailors in general. It was all good.
Big Jake opened prefs and strikes last night. O’C and Bietz and I spent a lot of time discussing this over the weekend. My thing is, you have 6 categories, from most preferred to strike. You can adjust them in tab as you see fit. The traditional thing to do is to have 1 through 4, then 5 is conflicts and 6 is strikes. Which means that everybody gets the chance to strike, say, 10% of the field and then conflict another 10%, which ultimately adds up to striking 20% of the field. But the tournament is giving you only 10% strikes, plus a what you need as conflicts. Using the normal system, you can turn that 10% strikes into 20%, conflicts or no conflicts. I don’t buy it. That means you just get way too many strikes. As I see it, every tournament allows you a few strikes to eliminate judges you know are toxic to you. That’s fine, although MJP almost removes that necessity. In any case, the more options you give somebody to eliminate judges, the more they will take you up on that option. This is where tournaments start catering to people who can only debate a certain way. As the VCA knows, I believe that MJP works against that, if everyone uses it. But MJP, plus 20% or so strikes, is effectively a true corralling of the judge pool the way you want it. And that’s too much. At some point you have to win over judges who are inimical to your style or position. If Romney and Obama only had to convince their constituencies, we wouldn’t have to hold the election, and we certainly wouldn’t have to have them debate. They have to win over the so-called undecideds. So should high school debaters, if they’re any good. If a high school debater is only good in front of some judges, that is fine, but it’s a limit that should be acknowledged. There’s nothing wrong with it, but it’s less competitive than the debater who is good in front of all judges. You’ll never convince me otherwise if we’re talking about the benefits of debate for high schoolers.
Anyhow, we worked it out at Jake that the rankings of 1-5 are real, and could happen. The ones down at the bottom probably won’t, but they could. At Yale, with a smaller pool, we had 4 categories plus strikes, which worked fine with that smaller pool. I think I had one 4-4 in a down-and-out round. As for conflicts, you go in and mark them in tabroom separately from everything else. This should mean that people just go in and conflict people who they really have a conflict with. This is as it should be. We’ll also give conflict sheets to the judges on arrival, but everyone knows that the judges never pay attention to those until after they’ve been assigned a round judging someone with whom they have a conflict. Given that most of the judges are supersmart college kids, the inability to plan the obvious five minutes ahead of time is fairly set in the genes. We’re used to it by now. Sigh.
Big Jake opened prefs and strikes last night. O’C and Bietz and I spent a lot of time discussing this over the weekend. My thing is, you have 6 categories, from most preferred to strike. You can adjust them in tab as you see fit. The traditional thing to do is to have 1 through 4, then 5 is conflicts and 6 is strikes. Which means that everybody gets the chance to strike, say, 10% of the field and then conflict another 10%, which ultimately adds up to striking 20% of the field. But the tournament is giving you only 10% strikes, plus a what you need as conflicts. Using the normal system, you can turn that 10% strikes into 20%, conflicts or no conflicts. I don’t buy it. That means you just get way too many strikes. As I see it, every tournament allows you a few strikes to eliminate judges you know are toxic to you. That’s fine, although MJP almost removes that necessity. In any case, the more options you give somebody to eliminate judges, the more they will take you up on that option. This is where tournaments start catering to people who can only debate a certain way. As the VCA knows, I believe that MJP works against that, if everyone uses it. But MJP, plus 20% or so strikes, is effectively a true corralling of the judge pool the way you want it. And that’s too much. At some point you have to win over judges who are inimical to your style or position. If Romney and Obama only had to convince their constituencies, we wouldn’t have to hold the election, and we certainly wouldn’t have to have them debate. They have to win over the so-called undecideds. So should high school debaters, if they’re any good. If a high school debater is only good in front of some judges, that is fine, but it’s a limit that should be acknowledged. There’s nothing wrong with it, but it’s less competitive than the debater who is good in front of all judges. You’ll never convince me otherwise if we’re talking about the benefits of debate for high schoolers.
Anyhow, we worked it out at Jake that the rankings of 1-5 are real, and could happen. The ones down at the bottom probably won’t, but they could. At Yale, with a smaller pool, we had 4 categories plus strikes, which worked fine with that smaller pool. I think I had one 4-4 in a down-and-out round. As for conflicts, you go in and mark them in tabroom separately from everything else. This should mean that people just go in and conflict people who they really have a conflict with. This is as it should be. We’ll also give conflict sheets to the judges on arrival, but everyone knows that the judges never pay attention to those until after they’ve been assigned a round judging someone with whom they have a conflict. Given that most of the judges are supersmart college kids, the inability to plan the obvious five minutes ahead of time is fairly set in the genes. We’re used to it by now. Sigh.
More Lego creations
Continuing our public service of providing one-stop shopping for all lovers of little blocks.
Real Large LEGO: Concrete Bridge Turned to Colorful Brick Is there some good reason we don't build real-life stuff out of these things?
There's two sides to every story (via BoingBoing):
This machine, which I first saw on BoingBoing, was all over the interwebs.
9 Mildly Disturbing Scenes Discovered At Legoland For instance, these "hot fireman."
There are complete instructions for making your own Lego Bento box, if you're inspired to do so. 
This machine, which I first saw on BoingBoing, was all over the interwebs.
9 Mildly Disturbing Scenes Discovered At Legoland For instance, these "hot fireman."
Monday, October 15, 2012
Debate: The First-Timer's MHL
So, sez you, what was the First-Timers’ like?
Oy, sez I.
First of all, we did use the DIY registrations, and that worked really well once I just gave up and rescheduled the tournament for 2018. Tabroom.com doesn’t like my keeping registration open on the day of a tournament, and I have to sneak up behind it when it is otherwise engaged or else it simply clams up and that’s the end of it. But I did mange to beat it into submission (although it seemed to wreak its vengeance later). Only two schools didn’t comply completely with the DIY, and I will deal with them separately. One was new to the game, the other a serial offender, so each in its own way.
So 9:00 crept up on the clock, and we looked out and saw a virtually packed auditorium, and we hightailed it out to the tabroom, planning on having everything paired by 9:30 and the rounds started by 10:00. As it turned out, we had about as much chance of that as Miss America simultaneously solving world hunger, ending all wars and putting an iPhone in every pot. We were met with the proverbial perfect storm, a serial attack of one damned thing after another, the likes of which none of us had ever seen before.
First of all, we couldn’t get the data to download out of tabroom. It turns out that we had a bad setting, and our immediate reaction, looking at the list of events and not seeing all of them, was to call CP and beg for mercy. Unfortunately, CP sleeps with his phone in the freezer, so by the time we heard from him, we had already gone to plan B and entered the missing data by hand. That was the first half hour we’d never get back. And then the printer went rogue on us. For a while it was pumping out so much paper we had to send an emergency call to Staples and have them rush in a few thousand reams just to keep up with the flow. JV was completely buried under it, with nothing showing but a piece of cowlick. By the time we got this stopped—we found a Dutch boy and had him stick his finger in it—we met with a complete jam, where roughly 728 pieces of paper were lodged in the printer in spaces where no paper had ever been before. This required about fifteen minutes of disassembly and re-greasing the skids, not to mention removing the Dutch boy’s finger, and then for reasons I can’t begin to comprehend, the Mac side of my machine starting sending work to my printer back home while the PC side decided that if it was set for pdfs it would print on the Brother, and if it was set for the Brother, it would create pdfs. It was about 10:30 that we got this all sorted out, as compared to 9:30, at which time the collected masses were sent off to their rounds, except apparently one whole floor of the building was locked and the custodian was nowhere to be found, and the only way out of this was to acquire the master key, kept in a jar on the principal’s office. (I may be getting some of this wrong, as I only overheard the details as I was feverishly trying to sort out a whole ‘nother issue of room double-booking.) With no other resort, O’C was forced to break into the sacred office, and the only way to do this was to break the window by tossing a Bronx novice through it, Bronx novices being in abundance and, well, if they lost a couple, they’d none of them be missed. At least, that's the story as I heard it. In any case, as a result, a hefty number of round ones didn’t happen.
Needless to say, we were running far enough behind that foregoing the fourth round was never much in doubt. Of course, four is a goal, not a promise. And to be honest, at a first-timers’ event, it’s not about the number of rounds, so much as it is about showing up, standing up and getting through the damned thing. Who knew that the same would apply both to the first-time debaters and to the tab room? In the immortal words of CP, repeated at least once at every tournament, “Are you sure you’ve ever done this before?”
What was very pleasing was not just the number of new schools but the success of those schools. I always worry that new programs will get discouraged, but not this batch. I think every single one of them had teams that took medals, and a couple managed to get first place! We’ll be seeing them again, I’m sure. And along the way, the Fordham coach came to me and pointed to the calendar and said that there’s a big bleeping hole in December and that he was willing to offer up his school to fill it. Which suggestion was immediately taken to heart by the assembled 3 out of 4 MHL directors, which means we’ll have an extra event in December for novices and JV. Excellent or what?
And now, back to Bronx again this weekend. I do hope we’ve got the bugs out of the system. (O’C: if you’re reading this, just put it out of your mind. It was all a one-off. Seriously. Maybe. I hope.)
Oy, sez I.
First of all, we did use the DIY registrations, and that worked really well once I just gave up and rescheduled the tournament for 2018. Tabroom.com doesn’t like my keeping registration open on the day of a tournament, and I have to sneak up behind it when it is otherwise engaged or else it simply clams up and that’s the end of it. But I did mange to beat it into submission (although it seemed to wreak its vengeance later). Only two schools didn’t comply completely with the DIY, and I will deal with them separately. One was new to the game, the other a serial offender, so each in its own way.
So 9:00 crept up on the clock, and we looked out and saw a virtually packed auditorium, and we hightailed it out to the tabroom, planning on having everything paired by 9:30 and the rounds started by 10:00. As it turned out, we had about as much chance of that as Miss America simultaneously solving world hunger, ending all wars and putting an iPhone in every pot. We were met with the proverbial perfect storm, a serial attack of one damned thing after another, the likes of which none of us had ever seen before.
First of all, we couldn’t get the data to download out of tabroom. It turns out that we had a bad setting, and our immediate reaction, looking at the list of events and not seeing all of them, was to call CP and beg for mercy. Unfortunately, CP sleeps with his phone in the freezer, so by the time we heard from him, we had already gone to plan B and entered the missing data by hand. That was the first half hour we’d never get back. And then the printer went rogue on us. For a while it was pumping out so much paper we had to send an emergency call to Staples and have them rush in a few thousand reams just to keep up with the flow. JV was completely buried under it, with nothing showing but a piece of cowlick. By the time we got this stopped—we found a Dutch boy and had him stick his finger in it—we met with a complete jam, where roughly 728 pieces of paper were lodged in the printer in spaces where no paper had ever been before. This required about fifteen minutes of disassembly and re-greasing the skids, not to mention removing the Dutch boy’s finger, and then for reasons I can’t begin to comprehend, the Mac side of my machine starting sending work to my printer back home while the PC side decided that if it was set for pdfs it would print on the Brother, and if it was set for the Brother, it would create pdfs. It was about 10:30 that we got this all sorted out, as compared to 9:30, at which time the collected masses were sent off to their rounds, except apparently one whole floor of the building was locked and the custodian was nowhere to be found, and the only way out of this was to acquire the master key, kept in a jar on the principal’s office. (I may be getting some of this wrong, as I only overheard the details as I was feverishly trying to sort out a whole ‘nother issue of room double-booking.) With no other resort, O’C was forced to break into the sacred office, and the only way to do this was to break the window by tossing a Bronx novice through it, Bronx novices being in abundance and, well, if they lost a couple, they’d none of them be missed. At least, that's the story as I heard it. In any case, as a result, a hefty number of round ones didn’t happen.
Needless to say, we were running far enough behind that foregoing the fourth round was never much in doubt. Of course, four is a goal, not a promise. And to be honest, at a first-timers’ event, it’s not about the number of rounds, so much as it is about showing up, standing up and getting through the damned thing. Who knew that the same would apply both to the first-time debaters and to the tab room? In the immortal words of CP, repeated at least once at every tournament, “Are you sure you’ve ever done this before?”
What was very pleasing was not just the number of new schools but the success of those schools. I always worry that new programs will get discouraged, but not this batch. I think every single one of them had teams that took medals, and a couple managed to get first place! We’ll be seeing them again, I’m sure. And along the way, the Fordham coach came to me and pointed to the calendar and said that there’s a big bleeping hole in December and that he was willing to offer up his school to fill it. Which suggestion was immediately taken to heart by the assembled 3 out of 4 MHL directors, which means we’ll have an extra event in December for novices and JV. Excellent or what?
And now, back to Bronx again this weekend. I do hope we’ve got the bugs out of the system. (O’C: if you’re reading this, just put it out of your mind. It was all a one-off. Seriously. Maybe. I hope.)
Music: Jobim
I saw this video, and just needed to share:
Antonio Carlos Jobim, and often Tom Jobim, and most often simply Jobim. He is something of a Brazilian god; around the world, just a god, period. I want to have his baby, except he's no longer with us, and I'm not quite built that way.
Eliane Elias (another CL favorite) doesn't do a bad job, starting with Aguas and moving on from there.
Here's an English language version of the song. John Pizzarelli reports that he was warned by Rosemary Clooney never to perform it without the lyrics in front of him.
And a little goodbye from Jobim himself, with a different number.
Antonio Carlos Jobim, and often Tom Jobim, and most often simply Jobim. He is something of a Brazilian god; around the world, just a god, period. I want to have his baby, except he's no longer with us, and I'm not quite built that way.
Eliane Elias (another CL favorite) doesn't do a bad job, starting with Aguas and moving on from there.
Here's an English language version of the song. John Pizzarelli reports that he was warned by Rosemary Clooney never to perform it without the lyrics in front of him.
And a little goodbye from Jobim himself, with a different number.
More links with little comment: Early Spielberg, boys' outfits, 2 kinds of people, the Beatles and the Bard, Pentatonix
More good stuff that speaks for itself:
- Watch Steven Spielberg’s Debut: Two Films He Directed as a Teenager That about says it all. Remarkably unamateurish, for some reason.
- I feel like I'm looking at something from another universe with this stuff: The Best Dressed Boys of 1930. Think knickerbockers will be coming back any time soon? Oh. Wait a minute. Now we call them below-the-knee shorts. I call them homey pants. Whatever.
- There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't. (That's a sign posted in the classroom where we hold debate meetings.) I say that in the spirit of the following clip collection.
- I remember seeing this when it was made, and hadn't seen it since. Gotta love the interwebs for keeping everything alive forever.
- Plenty of these guys' stuff is popular enough that you probably know them already. My take is that I love a cappella so much that I even like covers of songs I don't like. Then again, I like this original. So I'm posting this for the Boomers who also remember the original, and have no idea who Pentatonix is. (Are?)
P. G. Wodehouse
There are some people in the world who think that the character name Gussie Fink-Nottle is about as good as it gets. And that's just one of the folks created, of course, by Sir Pelham Grenville Wodehouse in his legendary series of Bertie and Jeeves stories. Needless to say, one ought to read Wodehouse, who was a master of language, and for that matter, listening to him via audiobooks is highly recommended, but no one ever went wrong watching Fry and Laurie take on the roles.
Others have also played the parts, with various levels of success, and there was an Andrew Lloyd Webber show, your opinion of which may depend on your love, or lack thereof, for Andrew Lloyd Webber.
Old Plum, as he was known, got into a bit of trouble with the Nazis, raising the question of whether he was, in fact, a sympathizer or merely a naive dupe. Who knows? I have a sense from what I've read that he was pretty much just so wrapped up in his work that he was rather stupidly ignorant, but he's not the first artist to fall into that category. Anyhow, in addition to his books and stories, he did a lot of theater work, including the songs from this little ditty. Talk about a more innocent age...
In the hall of fame it will be Jeeves and Bertie who last the longest. Which is only right. Today is also Michel Foucault's birthday, but I have found that his work is seldom as comic as Wodehouse's, hence I have chosen to profile the one rather than the other.
Others have also played the parts, with various levels of success, and there was an Andrew Lloyd Webber show, your opinion of which may depend on your love, or lack thereof, for Andrew Lloyd Webber.
Old Plum, as he was known, got into a bit of trouble with the Nazis, raising the question of whether he was, in fact, a sympathizer or merely a naive dupe. Who knows? I have a sense from what I've read that he was pretty much just so wrapped up in his work that he was rather stupidly ignorant, but he's not the first artist to fall into that category. Anyhow, in addition to his books and stories, he did a lot of theater work, including the songs from this little ditty. Talk about a more innocent age...
In the hall of fame it will be Jeeves and Bertie who last the longest. Which is only right. Today is also Michel Foucault's birthday, but I have found that his work is seldom as comic as Wodehouse's, hence I have chosen to profile the one rather than the other.
Friday, October 12, 2012
Riding off into the weekend: Epcot's birthday
Of course, for Walt, a man of his times, EPCOT was a potential solution to the problems of urbanization. He wasn't trying to lead us down the path of sterile ruin, he was trying to eliminate slums and tiresome commutes and economic unsteadiness. It just turned out that history has proven that his solution wasn't the right one. When he died in 1966, it was EPCOT that he left behind as his next step forward. The Florida Project was already a go. The Magic Kingdom would be built first, and then the city. But it was not to be.
I don't know whether Disney's successors came to believe that a city like EPCOT wouldn't work, or if they just weren't up to the task of attempting to create it. In any case, what they did come up with was a plan that united two different parks into one, a standing world's fair at least in its inception. On the one hand, corporations would show their ideas for the future, and on the other, countries would exhibit themselves and their people. It wasn't exactly a world's fair (usually countries want to show off their futures, not their pasts), but it was close enough.
It opened 30 years ago, in October of 1982.
It's changed a lot since the early days. Some of the changes are improvements, some are losses, but as with all of the Disney parks, they can't be envisioned as museums, and they move along with the times as the Disney corporation perceives of those times. I would kill to get Horizons back, as would most folks who remember it. Then again, who doesn't love Soarin'? Things come and go.
To celebrate the anniversary, some Epcot (now lower-cased) links:
The Epcot that never was: Walt's original proposal.
World Showcase original artwork I love concept art!
An Horizons tribute. Sigh...
The Universe of Energy original art.
And finally, original art from The Land.
All of this is from the Disney and More blog, which, needless to say, I highly recommend.
More articles we didn't finish reading
These headlines are all real, directly copied from our RSS feed without editing. When we say we didn't read them, we mean it. They didn't exactly pull us in, for some reason...
- Hulk Hogan sex tape: The wrestler shares his side of the story
- Hooray for Men's Underwear Sales!
- Sarah Palin revealed by dad, brother in “Our Sarah: Made in Alaska” memoir
- Mitt Romney Takes Some Tax Deductions Off the Table
- Taylor Swift on Her Messy Love Life
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Debate: AD, and some tournaments
Chrome, or more to the point, my DJ version of Chrome, has gone rogue. For reasons that elude me, it now spits out unfathomable fonts in place of, say, Courier, which for all its dullness, has never been accused of unfathomability. And I like Chrome so much… Oh, well, back to Firefox and Safari.
I’m very pleased with the look of the NYSDCA website. Having listened to SquareSpace being hawked on TWIT for the last millennium, I figured I’d give it a whirl, and while occasionally I have problems lugging things from one part of a page to another, it looks fine and is mostly easy. A nicety not immediately apparent is that a site that looks good on the computer screen also looks good on the mobile or tablet screen, with no effort on my part. We also moved the url over from the old WordPress site, which I never liked. Now I need to get traction with people actually using the site, providing resources and pictures and whatnot. It will happen.
The discussion of Academy Debate with the NYSDCA board (I sent it to them because I want the organization to officially support it) was, at the first volley, mostly about things unrelated to the concept, e.g., costs of tournaments. While I have nothing against discussing ways to reduce costs (and AD has one way, albeit a limited one, reducing the need to hire judges), it’s a separate argument, as were the other unrelated issues. The nice thing about discussing stuff with debate coaches is that they immediately recognize the concept of sticking to the framework and debating the pros and cons of the subject at hand. We seem to be working toward a practical application of the idea as the best forge for its development, and I’ll start on that this weekend. One thing that came up is that we might not allow students who have gone to debate camps to participate at this level. Maybe it’s better that we merely recommend they not participate. I don’t know. After all, in my mind we would only be doing this a few times a year, primarily because the tournaments we’d be doing it are already not attracting circuit types. We’ll see.
The First-Timers’ is this weekend, and on face looks to be pretty fantastic, with about 350 students (this includes small JV divisions). We’re also officially offering parent judge training; God knows how manypoor fish parents we’ll attract, but I know I’ve got 3 from Sailorville (1 ½ for each debating student). Lots of new schools this year, too. The thing about new schools is that they usually disappear quickly enough, but the more that start, the more that survive. Here’s hoping we can keep them committed.
On the opposite side of the spectrum, O’C is no doubt nearing the point of insanity on Jake, although he claims to be as calm as a cauliflower in a frozen tar pit. I’ve said this before: If Jake doesn’t drive him crazy, it’s only because he’s already crazy to attempt to do it pretty much on his own. The things people do…
And speaking of tournaments, Princeton is about to come to the plate, opening registration next week. This year we’re back to having PF off-campus, which is a boon to LD, but we’ll stick to the two hours on and off approach, as I don’t think anybody didn’t love it. You can plan your down time, and when it’s time to judge again, you don’t feel battered. Best, most timely ballot pickups in recent memory, as I recall it.
And Bump is plodding along. This is the point at which it’s wildly over capacity, and nothing is happening. I’m trying to acquire more judges (and if you’re one, let me know), but I’m not sanguine. It’ll be a BYOJ tournament, for the most part. Sigh. On the other hand, that’ll knock out a few of the ribbon clerks and clear up slots before long. But it’s too far away for people to be thinking about it seriously yet. After Jake, though, it’ll start looming in the public eye.
I’m very pleased with the look of the NYSDCA website. Having listened to SquareSpace being hawked on TWIT for the last millennium, I figured I’d give it a whirl, and while occasionally I have problems lugging things from one part of a page to another, it looks fine and is mostly easy. A nicety not immediately apparent is that a site that looks good on the computer screen also looks good on the mobile or tablet screen, with no effort on my part. We also moved the url over from the old WordPress site, which I never liked. Now I need to get traction with people actually using the site, providing resources and pictures and whatnot. It will happen.
The discussion of Academy Debate with the NYSDCA board (I sent it to them because I want the organization to officially support it) was, at the first volley, mostly about things unrelated to the concept, e.g., costs of tournaments. While I have nothing against discussing ways to reduce costs (and AD has one way, albeit a limited one, reducing the need to hire judges), it’s a separate argument, as were the other unrelated issues. The nice thing about discussing stuff with debate coaches is that they immediately recognize the concept of sticking to the framework and debating the pros and cons of the subject at hand. We seem to be working toward a practical application of the idea as the best forge for its development, and I’ll start on that this weekend. One thing that came up is that we might not allow students who have gone to debate camps to participate at this level. Maybe it’s better that we merely recommend they not participate. I don’t know. After all, in my mind we would only be doing this a few times a year, primarily because the tournaments we’d be doing it are already not attracting circuit types. We’ll see.
The First-Timers’ is this weekend, and on face looks to be pretty fantastic, with about 350 students (this includes small JV divisions). We’re also officially offering parent judge training; God knows how many
On the opposite side of the spectrum, O’C is no doubt nearing the point of insanity on Jake, although he claims to be as calm as a cauliflower in a frozen tar pit. I’ve said this before: If Jake doesn’t drive him crazy, it’s only because he’s already crazy to attempt to do it pretty much on his own. The things people do…
And speaking of tournaments, Princeton is about to come to the plate, opening registration next week. This year we’re back to having PF off-campus, which is a boon to LD, but we’ll stick to the two hours on and off approach, as I don’t think anybody didn’t love it. You can plan your down time, and when it’s time to judge again, you don’t feel battered. Best, most timely ballot pickups in recent memory, as I recall it.
And Bump is plodding along. This is the point at which it’s wildly over capacity, and nothing is happening. I’m trying to acquire more judges (and if you’re one, let me know), but I’m not sanguine. It’ll be a BYOJ tournament, for the most part. Sigh. On the other hand, that’ll knock out a few of the ribbon clerks and clear up slots before long. But it’s too far away for people to be thinking about it seriously yet. After Jake, though, it’ll start looming in the public eye.
Some more handsome devils
Another set of folks you ought to recognize.
We're looking for the name of the guy in this first one:
Nice dress:
We're looking for the young lady on the right:
Imagine her as a little girl.
Just change the mustache a little bit...
Answers: #1
#2
#3 (the 7th picture down: her married name was the same as her maiden name)
#4
#5
We're looking for the name of the guy in this first one:
Nice dress:
Imagine her as a little girl.
Just change the mustache a little bit...
Answers: #1
#2
#3 (the 7th picture down: her married name was the same as her maiden name)
#4
#5
Movie pot pourri: Chaplin, Miles, Zisek, Cinerama, Welles
A collection of movies to watch, and postings about movies.
- Charlie Chaplin’s City Lights (Full Film) Arguably Chaplin's best feature. Note that it was made during the sound era; Chaplin was nothing if not dedicated to his own beliefs.
- GENIUS, HUSTLER, SUPERSTAR: ‘THE MILES DAVIS STORY’ Lots of good music, lots of Miles, who was probably the coolest guy in the room (in the true meaning of cool) his entire life.
- This is Slavoj Zisek on Vertigo. The Vast Coachean Army already knows my opinion of this movie lording it over all the rest at the top of the 50, but that doesn't make it, in my estimation, a bad movie. In any case, watch it (elsewhere) and judge for yourself, then listen to what SZ has to say
- The wayward charms of Cinerama Once upon a time, Cinerama was a big thing (no pun intended). As this article says, it was something of a precursor to IMAX, but the concept was much more surrounding and horizontal. To be honest, it really didn't work all that well, but there is something to be said for seeing 2001: A Space Odyssey in this format, which I did the first time I saw it. Anyhow, it's one for the history books now, but movie technology buffs will enjoy this.
- There is lively debate over whether Chimes at Midnight is, well, any good. It is, at times, wildly creative, and at times, a little dull. Here's the whole thing. At the very least, watch them fight in the mud, starting at about 54:00.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Academy Debate
The idea we are considering to invigorate the middle level of participation in debate is called Academy Debate. In a way, this is little more than a rejiggering of JV, but if implemented at invitationals, it could change those events dramatically. On the one hand, it creates a new division with a different judging structure. On the other hand, it restructures tournaments to offer not just rounds of debate, but also debate education.
Here is the message I sent to the board of the NYSDCA to get the discussion kicked off:
We need a division of debate that recognizes that while every student can benefit from forensics, not every student wishes to make it their life’s work. Additionally, we need to provide a better link from beginner to varsity, regardless of a student’s commitment to the activity. And finally, we need to insure that all our regional tournaments provide the community with appropriate levels of competition and engagement, so that our rich competitive calendar continues to thrive.
I offer the solution tentatively titled Academy Debate.
Academy Debate is, essentially, a level of competition that can be applied to any division of policy, LD or PF. Academy Debate is primarily intended for sophomores and juniors, and is open to anyone except seniors and students past their third year of debate (i.e., juniors who debated in middle school now in their fourth year would not be eligible to participate at the Academy Debate level).
Additionally, Academy Debate can be judged by seniors in their fourth year of debate. In fact, seniors in their fourth year are urged to judge, and will be considered not only judges but instructors, especially at tournaments that embrace the full Academy Debate designation.
We have a number of students at the senior level who have a lot to give to the community beyond their ability to adjudicate rounds less expensively than college students (although one reason for creating the Academy level is to remove the need to hire judges for local tournaments). This proposal intends to use those other skills of our upperclassmen. The idea is that if a tournament wishes to adopt an Academy Debate structure, we (the NYSDCA) will work with the tournament to develop a program beyond the rounds that will be interwoven into the tournament. Beyond-‐ the-‐Rounds activities will include lectures and brainstorms on new resolutions, demo rounds by TOC-‐level seniors with commentary, stop rounds (coaches judging a round can break in at any time with advice and questions), background lectures by coaches and student instructors (e.g., a unit on sovereignty or due process or whatever). The hope is to work maybe three of these special events into a tournament, during down time and even in lieu of a round.
Our belief is that this will invigorate tournaments that do not have TOC bids by making them appealing to younger students, who can come and actually learn something, and to older students, who can come and, quite frankly, show off their skills.
Any tournaments in the region could find material that would be of great interest in the Academy Debate model, depending on the time of year. There are always new resolutions to explore and new techniques to learn. For instance, look at January in the northeast. On Martin Luther King weekend we have Big Lex, a triple-‐threat TOC-‐ level tournament with heavy competition in each division. Additionally, for most LDers this is the first TOC-‐level shot at the Jan-‐Feb resolution that will also be the TOC resolution and, probably, the NYSDCA resolution. In our present system:
• Seniors and TOC hopefuls are working hard on their cases, and have little interest in “prepping for Lex” at a tournament with competition not at their own level.
• Younger students are preparing to have their heads handed to them at Lexington, starting for some what might be the inglorious end of their careers because they are not interested in continuing with high stakes TOC level competition.
• Nobody knows what other schools are going to be running, and everybody finds out during the competition. And if you happen to be running something totally illogical that sounded really good back home, well, it’s too late now.
These apply fairly equally across the divisions, but of course with different ramifications. January in PF, for instance, is rich with opportunities, but again, is it best to dive into a TOC bid tournament with a new case filled with untested ideas? Well, what if there were an Academy Debate tournament the week before Big Lex?
• Seniors who are working hard on their cases would not have to present a finished case, but as judges they could hear what other folks are running and maybe get some ideas therefrom.
• Seniors who have been working hard will get a chance to lecture and brainstorm their ideas
• A coach or two might do a half hour unit on background for both the PF and LD divisions
• A “lab” might do a training session on CX for all divisions You get the picture.
To pull this off requires commitment from everyone. There is a fear that some tournaments, primarily those without TOC bids, are not getting the attendance they deserve. (The likelihood that any new tournament will somehow work its way up to attaining bids is, honestly, about nil, given the politics of TOC.) At the same time, there is a big issue that we want younger students to remain in the activity if at all possible without becoming dispirited. Additionally, the removal of the need to provide hired judges seriously reduces the cost of debate in the region. And for large programs, there becomes a logical way to split the squad between events. There are other things that venues, and the NYSDCA, can do to improve to improve tournaments, but they are outside the range of the Academy Debate concept, and will be presented elsewhere.
Here is the message I sent to the board of the NYSDCA to get the discussion kicked off:
We need a division of debate that recognizes that while every student can benefit from forensics, not every student wishes to make it their life’s work. Additionally, we need to provide a better link from beginner to varsity, regardless of a student’s commitment to the activity. And finally, we need to insure that all our regional tournaments provide the community with appropriate levels of competition and engagement, so that our rich competitive calendar continues to thrive.
I offer the solution tentatively titled Academy Debate.
Academy Debate is, essentially, a level of competition that can be applied to any division of policy, LD or PF. Academy Debate is primarily intended for sophomores and juniors, and is open to anyone except seniors and students past their third year of debate (i.e., juniors who debated in middle school now in their fourth year would not be eligible to participate at the Academy Debate level).
Additionally, Academy Debate can be judged by seniors in their fourth year of debate. In fact, seniors in their fourth year are urged to judge, and will be considered not only judges but instructors, especially at tournaments that embrace the full Academy Debate designation.
We have a number of students at the senior level who have a lot to give to the community beyond their ability to adjudicate rounds less expensively than college students (although one reason for creating the Academy level is to remove the need to hire judges for local tournaments). This proposal intends to use those other skills of our upperclassmen. The idea is that if a tournament wishes to adopt an Academy Debate structure, we (the NYSDCA) will work with the tournament to develop a program beyond the rounds that will be interwoven into the tournament. Beyond-‐ the-‐Rounds activities will include lectures and brainstorms on new resolutions, demo rounds by TOC-‐level seniors with commentary, stop rounds (coaches judging a round can break in at any time with advice and questions), background lectures by coaches and student instructors (e.g., a unit on sovereignty or due process or whatever). The hope is to work maybe three of these special events into a tournament, during down time and even in lieu of a round.
Our belief is that this will invigorate tournaments that do not have TOC bids by making them appealing to younger students, who can come and actually learn something, and to older students, who can come and, quite frankly, show off their skills.
Any tournaments in the region could find material that would be of great interest in the Academy Debate model, depending on the time of year. There are always new resolutions to explore and new techniques to learn. For instance, look at January in the northeast. On Martin Luther King weekend we have Big Lex, a triple-‐threat TOC-‐ level tournament with heavy competition in each division. Additionally, for most LDers this is the first TOC-‐level shot at the Jan-‐Feb resolution that will also be the TOC resolution and, probably, the NYSDCA resolution. In our present system:
• Seniors and TOC hopefuls are working hard on their cases, and have little interest in “prepping for Lex” at a tournament with competition not at their own level.
• Younger students are preparing to have their heads handed to them at Lexington, starting for some what might be the inglorious end of their careers because they are not interested in continuing with high stakes TOC level competition.
• Nobody knows what other schools are going to be running, and everybody finds out during the competition. And if you happen to be running something totally illogical that sounded really good back home, well, it’s too late now.
These apply fairly equally across the divisions, but of course with different ramifications. January in PF, for instance, is rich with opportunities, but again, is it best to dive into a TOC bid tournament with a new case filled with untested ideas? Well, what if there were an Academy Debate tournament the week before Big Lex?
• Seniors who are working hard on their cases would not have to present a finished case, but as judges they could hear what other folks are running and maybe get some ideas therefrom.
• Seniors who have been working hard will get a chance to lecture and brainstorm their ideas
• A coach or two might do a half hour unit on background for both the PF and LD divisions
• A “lab” might do a training session on CX for all divisions You get the picture.
To pull this off requires commitment from everyone. There is a fear that some tournaments, primarily those without TOC bids, are not getting the attendance they deserve. (The likelihood that any new tournament will somehow work its way up to attaining bids is, honestly, about nil, given the politics of TOC.) At the same time, there is a big issue that we want younger students to remain in the activity if at all possible without becoming dispirited. Additionally, the removal of the need to provide hired judges seriously reduces the cost of debate in the region. And for large programs, there becomes a logical way to split the squad between events. There are other things that venues, and the NYSDCA, can do to improve to improve tournaments, but they are outside the range of the Academy Debate concept, and will be presented elsewhere.
Tuesday, October 09, 2012
Debate: Ten to one my weekend was more event-filled than yours
Very unusual weekend:
- Tabbed Monticello? Check.
- Mistakenly upgraded iPhone to IOS 6? Check.
- Daughter married? Check.
- Website for NYSDCA? Check.
- Academy Debate defined? Check.
And you thought I didn’t have a private life. Pshaw! I have to admit, though, that the speed of this rather took me aback, which is probably why, when I plugged in my iPhone Saturday night to grab a couple of new books from Audible (I prefer using iTunes to the Audible app), when I was asked if I wanted to upgrade, I said yes. I forgot completely that I wanted to wait for IOS 6 until a couple of advancements on the following decimal, but what are you going to do? I had already gotten MapQuest to solve the major problem of turning left in Albuquerque to get to the Hindu Kush. As for the rest, we’ll see.
As for Monticello, well, it was small, which meant a lot of hand-pairing, since TRPC refused to have anything to do with it. But by the same token, I had plenty of time on my hands to, first of all, advance the idea of what I’m calling Academy Debate, which in some ways is a revitalization of JV, but a lot more, as it calls on the resources of the NYSDCA to work with tournaments to insure their continued prosperity. I’ll talk about that more tomorrow.
And I also went to SquareSpace and threw together a new NYSDCA website, which went live today. And also there’s a @nysdca Twitter account and a gmail account. And O'C has pointed me to our Facebook account. We’re cooking with the proverbial gas, in other words. Again, more on these things shortly. The most important is Academy Debate, which, as I say, we’ll go into tomorrow.
More articles we didn't finish reading
These headlines are all real, directly copied from our RSS feed without editing. When we say we didn't read them, we mean it. They didn't exactly pull us in, for some reason...
- TURN YOURSELF INTO A PLAGUE
- Lady Gaga Vomits Onstage in Barcelona
- Tobacco enemas for everyone!
- When Did Military Hats Get So Boring?
- Jews Not Keen On Neo-Nazis: Science
- Roach-Eating Contest Ends With Winner's Terrible Death
Monday, October 08, 2012
Friday, October 05, 2012
Riding off into the weekend
I've shown videos before. This one is narrated.
CoasterRadio.com has had a long running podcast, first with a fairly large cast, and then off for a while, and then back with a duo. It's a lot of fun, and if you're into this sort of thing, why not give it a try? After all, you didn't go to Monticello this weekend, so what else do you have to do with the holiday?
CoasterRadio.com has had a long running podcast, first with a fairly large cast, and then off for a while, and then back with a duo. It's a lot of fun, and if you're into this sort of thing, why not give it a try? After all, you didn't go to Monticello this weekend, so what else do you have to do with the holiday?
More articles we didn't finish reading
These headlines are all real, directly copied from our RSS feed without editing. When we say we didn't read them, we mean it. They didn't exactly pull us in, for some reason...
- Meet the ‘invisible people’ who pick up the trash at Mitt’s $12 million beachfront mansion
- Here Is A Cautionary Illustration Of Why You Should Not Stick Your Head In A Trash Can
- Things You Need to Know about Memory Foam Mattresses
- Pass Me That Bowl of Maggots, Will You?
- And Here Is a Wookiee Belly-Dancing to a Four-Piece Klingon Band
Thursday, October 04, 2012
Debate: And God said, let there be another God
There comes a time in the life of every programmer when programming one more line of code will put him or her over the edge. Have you ever looked at computer code? Have you ever programmed the stuff? I've done it, years ago, in Basic, and I've watched CP zip away in Perl like a house afire. It's all really intricate stuff that requires you to maintain a line of thought from the beginning to the end of the logic you're trying to effect, and any distraction will send you immediately back to the beginning, and the slightest syntax error could set off bombs everywhere. It takes a certain kind of mind to do this, but even that kind of mind has its limits.
And that's where things go a little nutty.
CP is, of course, the proud parent of tabroom.com. For the longest time he maintained the system alone, which means that not only was he always keeping the pipes fitted and the steam rising, he also had to deal with user issues. Like any systems person, the idea of dealing with users is a virtual nightmare. It's not that they don't like people—CP is rather a friendly fellow, in his overly tall way—but they don't like dealing with the laity about computer issues. It's like the Pope not wanting to explain to a Unitarian where they keep the Vatican's sacred monkeys. They just don't want to get involved in that conversation out of fear of losing their sanity. In CP's case, he enlisted a couple of us to work with the outside world, AKA the users, as his interlocutors. He called this admin status "godlike powers." It means mostly that we can go into the system and help people fix their tournaments or get logged in correctly or whatever. It's logical for me to have those powers because I tab every week, and it makes life easier for not only me but the tournament directors I deal with. And CP doesn't have to get involved in any of it.
Meanwhile, there's O'C. There has never been a person on the face of the earth who is more interested in the minutia of debate than Jon Cruz. He has all his ballots from his novice LD year. Come to think of it, he has all of everyone's ballots from their novice LD year. He tracks every tournament in the country obsessively. He knows who signs up, he knows who drops, he knows how well they do. He knows when they are sleeping, he knows when they're awake, he knows if they've been bad or good, and I wouldn't be surprised if he breaks into their homes on Christmas Eve to check up on them, which is why a lot of debaters leave cookies and milk out at night, just in case.
The fact that I had godlike powers on tabroom and that O'C did not just drove him crazy. If he asked Palmer once, he asked him a million times, to give him these powers too. And every time, Palmer said no.
And then one night, when Palmer hit that time in the life of every programmer when programming one more line of code will put him over the edge, he was reminded of O'C wanting godlike powers. And he decided to do something about it.
One day shortly thereafter, I saw Palmer, for whatever reason, and he took me aside and told me that because I have godlike powers on tabroom, it is within my abilities to give someone else those same godlike powers. I could even give them to Cruz. According to Palmer, he didn't want to do it himself, because if I did it, he could claim plausible deniability. If I did it, sub rosa, everybody would be happy. Just don't do it when Palmer was around: that was the only limitation.
During the MHL Workshop last week, when we had some downtime, I remembered this exchange with Palmer, and when we had a break, I took Cruz aside and told him I had a present for him. We went into a small room with a computer, and I explained that I was going to give him godlike powers on tabroom, but that he had to be very careful with them, and promise not to screw anything up, but that it was all right with Chris as long as O'C used his powers wisely. With great power comes great responsibility, and all that. For Cruz, this was Christmas, Hannukah, the lottery, American Idol and the Lost Ark all wrapped into one. His brain was about to explode at the mere the thought of it.
So I logged into tabroom and turned on my godlike powers. I went over to O'C's account and brought it onto the screen. Right there, as big as day, was the button to grant him godlike powers.
With Cruz sitting right next to me, his eyes aglow knowing that perhaps his greatest dream since becoming a debate coach was about to come true, I clicked the button.
And now you can too:
--> CLICK HERE <--
And that's where things go a little nutty.
CP is, of course, the proud parent of tabroom.com. For the longest time he maintained the system alone, which means that not only was he always keeping the pipes fitted and the steam rising, he also had to deal with user issues. Like any systems person, the idea of dealing with users is a virtual nightmare. It's not that they don't like people—CP is rather a friendly fellow, in his overly tall way—but they don't like dealing with the laity about computer issues. It's like the Pope not wanting to explain to a Unitarian where they keep the Vatican's sacred monkeys. They just don't want to get involved in that conversation out of fear of losing their sanity. In CP's case, he enlisted a couple of us to work with the outside world, AKA the users, as his interlocutors. He called this admin status "godlike powers." It means mostly that we can go into the system and help people fix their tournaments or get logged in correctly or whatever. It's logical for me to have those powers because I tab every week, and it makes life easier for not only me but the tournament directors I deal with. And CP doesn't have to get involved in any of it.
Meanwhile, there's O'C. There has never been a person on the face of the earth who is more interested in the minutia of debate than Jon Cruz. He has all his ballots from his novice LD year. Come to think of it, he has all of everyone's ballots from their novice LD year. He tracks every tournament in the country obsessively. He knows who signs up, he knows who drops, he knows how well they do. He knows when they are sleeping, he knows when they're awake, he knows if they've been bad or good, and I wouldn't be surprised if he breaks into their homes on Christmas Eve to check up on them, which is why a lot of debaters leave cookies and milk out at night, just in case.
The fact that I had godlike powers on tabroom and that O'C did not just drove him crazy. If he asked Palmer once, he asked him a million times, to give him these powers too. And every time, Palmer said no.
And then one night, when Palmer hit that time in the life of every programmer when programming one more line of code will put him over the edge, he was reminded of O'C wanting godlike powers. And he decided to do something about it.
One day shortly thereafter, I saw Palmer, for whatever reason, and he took me aside and told me that because I have godlike powers on tabroom, it is within my abilities to give someone else those same godlike powers. I could even give them to Cruz. According to Palmer, he didn't want to do it himself, because if I did it, he could claim plausible deniability. If I did it, sub rosa, everybody would be happy. Just don't do it when Palmer was around: that was the only limitation.
During the MHL Workshop last week, when we had some downtime, I remembered this exchange with Palmer, and when we had a break, I took Cruz aside and told him I had a present for him. We went into a small room with a computer, and I explained that I was going to give him godlike powers on tabroom, but that he had to be very careful with them, and promise not to screw anything up, but that it was all right with Chris as long as O'C used his powers wisely. With great power comes great responsibility, and all that. For Cruz, this was Christmas, Hannukah, the lottery, American Idol and the Lost Ark all wrapped into one. His brain was about to explode at the mere the thought of it.
So I logged into tabroom and turned on my godlike powers. I went over to O'C's account and brought it onto the screen. Right there, as big as day, was the button to grant him godlike powers.
With Cruz sitting right next to me, his eyes aglow knowing that perhaps his greatest dream since becoming a debate coach was about to come true, I clicked the button.
And now you can too:
--> CLICK HERE <--
Wednesday, October 03, 2012
Debate: The attack of the undead
Last night there were 8 Sailors at the meeting. Since I thought I only had 5 1/2, this was rather noteworthy. We had already noted the reemergence of OK last week, and he was back yet again, shockingly enough. He might really be back for the duration. I had talked to the Zip parental units at the parents' meeting, and lo and behold, the Zipster himself was back, although without his fuzzy slippers. And finally, there was this sophomore George, whose name is Robert, who never actually debated last year, who was also back. Presumably this trio were all there simply to eat our brains, so I admit I remained on the alert for the whole meeting. If I have to start bringing a baseball bat to future meetings, so be it. The living dead aren't going to destroy my team, make no mistake about that!
The first-timers' event seems awfully early this year. Usually if follows the Bronx, this year it precedes it. Which means that we're really speeding things up. Oh, well. We can sleep when we're dead. (Which, as I pointed out, may be sooner than we think, if I don't bring my baseball bat.) We covered the structure of an LD round and laid out some themes for cases of Mod Nod. I feel so rushed, though, and that's not a good feeling.
I don't know how much effect my screed yesterday about attending tournaments had overall, but I did get a few responses. The thing is, it wasn't really about Monticello, which is just one of the tournaments that people are letting dangle in the wind. I do think that Monti can be improved, and I know just the people to do it, the Monti team. Plus, as I've said, we have ideas for supporting tournaments officially with some nice bells and whistles. But we can't make people come. The tournament, any tournament, is only as good as the people who attend. I've watched an awful lot of ebb and flow over the years, of tournaments rising and sinking in prominence. I can understand that. Things change. But I have also seen a most amazing case, possibly the most striking example of the community abandoning a tournament, then blaming the tournament for their abandoning it, while the tournament itself didn't change much at all, except in the number and provenance of the attendees. The tournament lost its bids, and the debate community pretty much turned its back on it, not going there and then complaining that nobody went there. Attendance progressively shrunk year after year. It almost died, not of natural causes, but of politics and neglect. I remember tabbing it practically on my fingers. I'm sort of proud that I stuck with it through thick and thin, and in a small way kept it alive, because that means that when it runs again this year, I can say to myself that I'm a part of it. (Big Bronx, obviously.) The comparison to Monti is not terribly invalid, although in the latter case, it is not informed by petty politics and national $ircuit skullduggery. Anyhow, Monti will happen this year, although without the Official Meatloaf of the MHL, and with any luck, we'll start getting it back into contention. I'm sanguine.
Although, to be honest, I'd be more sanguine with a belly full of meatloaf and fewer zombies attacking me.
The first-timers' event seems awfully early this year. Usually if follows the Bronx, this year it precedes it. Which means that we're really speeding things up. Oh, well. We can sleep when we're dead. (Which, as I pointed out, may be sooner than we think, if I don't bring my baseball bat.) We covered the structure of an LD round and laid out some themes for cases of Mod Nod. I feel so rushed, though, and that's not a good feeling.
I don't know how much effect my screed yesterday about attending tournaments had overall, but I did get a few responses. The thing is, it wasn't really about Monticello, which is just one of the tournaments that people are letting dangle in the wind. I do think that Monti can be improved, and I know just the people to do it, the Monti team. Plus, as I've said, we have ideas for supporting tournaments officially with some nice bells and whistles. But we can't make people come. The tournament, any tournament, is only as good as the people who attend. I've watched an awful lot of ebb and flow over the years, of tournaments rising and sinking in prominence. I can understand that. Things change. But I have also seen a most amazing case, possibly the most striking example of the community abandoning a tournament, then blaming the tournament for their abandoning it, while the tournament itself didn't change much at all, except in the number and provenance of the attendees. The tournament lost its bids, and the debate community pretty much turned its back on it, not going there and then complaining that nobody went there. Attendance progressively shrunk year after year. It almost died, not of natural causes, but of politics and neglect. I remember tabbing it practically on my fingers. I'm sort of proud that I stuck with it through thick and thin, and in a small way kept it alive, because that means that when it runs again this year, I can say to myself that I'm a part of it. (Big Bronx, obviously.) The comparison to Monti is not terribly invalid, although in the latter case, it is not informed by petty politics and national $ircuit skullduggery. Anyhow, Monti will happen this year, although without the Official Meatloaf of the MHL, and with any luck, we'll start getting it back into contention. I'm sanguine.
Although, to be honest, I'd be more sanguine with a belly full of meatloaf and fewer zombies attacking me.
Peter Cook and Dudley Moore
Peter Cook and Dudley Moore, along with Alan Bennett and Jonathan Miller, comprised Beyond the Fringe, an early 60s British show that, among other things, spawned Monty Python. Thereafter, Cook and Moore performed often as a duo.
There are about a hundred version of the unidexter on YouTube:
This next one is a later performance of a skit that did spawn a very real restaurant in New Jersey (where else?). Different menu, though, I think:
At the height of their fame, they starred in Bedazzled, Moore as the hapless Stanley Moon, and Cook as one of the best filmed devils ever. Here Cook is introducing himself.
Stanley is granted seven wishes in the film (and each wish is actuated via the uttering of the magic phrase, "Julie Andrews"). As a result of one of his wishes, the woman he loves finally reciprocates his feelings. Unfortunately, they are both nuns, of the order described in this bit:
Python fans with an interest in roots can do worse than scouring the interwebs for these guys.
There are about a hundred version of the unidexter on YouTube:
This next one is a later performance of a skit that did spawn a very real restaurant in New Jersey (where else?). Different menu, though, I think:
At the height of their fame, they starred in Bedazzled, Moore as the hapless Stanley Moon, and Cook as one of the best filmed devils ever. Here Cook is introducing himself.
Stanley is granted seven wishes in the film (and each wish is actuated via the uttering of the magic phrase, "Julie Andrews"). As a result of one of his wishes, the woman he loves finally reciprocates his feelings. Unfortunately, they are both nuns, of the order described in this bit:
Python fans with an interest in roots can do worse than scouring the interwebs for these guys.
More links with little comment: Garbo, snake venom wine, the really original Disneyland, how to use the telephone, Flash fights
More good stuff that speaks for itself:
- Scandals of Classic Hollywood: The Exquisite Garbo It amazes me how dead old movies are to most people. Then again, most old things are dead to most people, and it's their loss. As soon as someone can provide for me a link between new and good, I'll change my tune. Anyhow, Garbo is Garbo, and at least film fans will enjoy this one.
- If you are not a fan of snakes, don't look at this: Asian snake venom wine (It’s a real thing).
- The original concept map for Disneyland, blown up so that you can load it into a separate tab and practically walk around in it! Herb Ryman's Disneyland Map Artwork
- Once upon a time, there were no telephones. Then there were. Here's the online user guide: How to Use the Telephone, 1917
- Caught this one on BoingBoing. My jaw is still hanging open:
His Girl Friday
Haven't ever seen this movie? Just go watch it. Now. Don't come back until you're done.
Now you can thank me.
If you have seen the movie, watch this, which will make you want to watch it again.
Now you can thank me.
If you have seen the movie, watch this, which will make you want to watch it again.
Tuesday, October 02, 2012
Debate: What?
So needless to say, I was rather upset by the lack of entries at Monticello. But they're not alone in not getting their share of attendance. Some of it is their fault, and I have some thoughts for them on how to improve. But most of it is the region allowing them to dangle. I just don't like that. We need to get this tier of tournaments to be strongly attended. I particularly have suffered from loss of second-year students, especially in today's LD world. It is not a generally appealing activity anymore. I don't blame them. Which is why I'm doing everything I can to keep debate available to as many people as possible. I believe MJP does that. As will some ideas we kicked around Saturday during the NYSDCA meeting.
I admit it. I do like fighting the fight.
Last night was the Parents' meeting, with quite a good turnout. I love talking to them, going through what is by now a pretty polished presentation. Of course, this year they were more of the speech than the debate persuasion, and don't need to know about the whole housing/traveling thing that debaters do. So it goes. A couple of parents lit into me for yelling at the speechies about not getting signed up for the team, but I can't get apologetic about that. If they're not signed up by October, then when? They've already had a tournament they could have signed up to observe at. And Bump is in a couple of weeks and I need to make assignments, and we need to get housing. Can't do that from the people who aren't on my list.
Speaking of Bump, it opened yesterday and is now pretty much filled up. I underdid the VPF limit, so I opened that up and cleared some folks off the waitlist. Of course, if anyone is expecting me to supply hired LD judges, good luck with that. I've got the People's Champion and HoraceMan, but most everybody else I'll put into PF, aside from late breaks. I just don't have the alums I used to have capable of doing the judging of that event. Things change...
I admit it. I do like fighting the fight.
Last night was the Parents' meeting, with quite a good turnout. I love talking to them, going through what is by now a pretty polished presentation. Of course, this year they were more of the speech than the debate persuasion, and don't need to know about the whole housing/traveling thing that debaters do. So it goes. A couple of parents lit into me for yelling at the speechies about not getting signed up for the team, but I can't get apologetic about that. If they're not signed up by October, then when? They've already had a tournament they could have signed up to observe at. And Bump is in a couple of weeks and I need to make assignments, and we need to get housing. Can't do that from the people who aren't on my list.
Speaking of Bump, it opened yesterday and is now pretty much filled up. I underdid the VPF limit, so I opened that up and cleared some folks off the waitlist. Of course, if anyone is expecting me to supply hired LD judges, good luck with that. I've got the People's Champion and HoraceMan, but most everybody else I'll put into PF, aside from late breaks. I just don't have the alums I used to have capable of doing the judging of that event. Things change...
Coachean Feed: robot killers, Pinker on free speech, race as social construct, LWOP = CP, anti-women bias in the sciences
- Lethal autonomous robots. Oh, great. Automated killing machines with a mind of their own. Discuss. Robots at War: Scholars Debate the Ethical Issues
- Interview with Harvard psychology professor Steven Pinker about free speech This may be as good as it gets. You should read all of Pinker, period.
- What Do We Know About Race? Simple. It's a social construct, and nothing else.
- LWOP is just as bad as capital punishment, and both should be abandoned? That isn't a lot of help with death penalty cases, but it may be true. The Cruelty of Life Imprisonment Without Parole
- Read 'em and weep. The gender bias against women in science is real (in case you weren't aware of it). Links in the article take you to the source material. SCIENTISTS, YOUR GENDER BIAS IS SHOWING
Debate: Open Letter to Our Colleagues in the Region
Although we are sending this via the mailing lists of the MHL and the NYSDCA, we do not claim to speak officially for those groups in this message. We speak entirely for ourselves.
We are not quite sure what we are up to these days as a region. On the one hand, we are rich in opportunities for debate. On the other hand, schools are not taking advantage of these opportunities. Schools pick and choose what tournaments to attend based on criteria that are seemingly self-defeating and demonstrably tournament-defeating. No one has anything to gain by this. If tournaments disappear from the schedule, venues that have time and again proven capable of hosting complicated contests over the span of a weekend will disappear, as will their desperately needed fund-raising, and the number of rounds available to everyone else’s students will diminish accordingly.
This is not acceptable.
First of all, as a region, meeting and competing week after week, we have a, dare we say, social contract to support one another. You have your tournament, I have my tournament, we all try to get to all of them. Obviously no one can be in two places at once, but given a choice of place to be, local should be first.
However, that doesn’t seem to be the real issue, i.e., folks traveling great distances to attend tournaments rather than those in the region. The problem instead is simply schools not supporting local events. We believe that every program needs to ask itself if it doesn’t have an obligation to support the programs of its neighbors, often on a reciprocal basis. The reason a team attends a tournament is not so that the hosts will attend the team’s own tournament, but by the same token, if a team does support a given tournament, doesn’t that tournament bear some responsibility in returning that support?
Secondly, the tournaments that seem to be suffering from what we see as neglect are not the powerhouse local tournaments. The tournaments that are hurting usually offer no TOC bids, and are perceived as unappealing to the top varsity debaters in search of those bids. Quite honestly, there is sense to this, that the top varsity debaters would seek competition at their own level, especially those with the talent and drive (and money) to attempt to qualify at the national circuit level. But this is not every debater on a team. An active program with members at every grade level absolutely has students who are not on the TOC trail. Some may be some day; some may never look in that direction. Do we abandon them? Do we believe that because they are not as competitive, they don’t deserve the benefits of forensics? Do any of us really want to live in that world?
Obviously we are referring to the immediate situation of the Monticello tournament, but that tournament is not alone in this. But we’ll stick with that. Monticello has no TOC bids. It is not a tournament that will appeal to a program’s top varsity. But it is a proven tournament, for more years than almost any other event in the region. It is a most hospitable school, year in and year out. And on the flip side, it is a program that actively attends virtually every other tournament in the region. They are there, week in and week out. Their own tournament is capable of being a fantastic opportunity for younger debaters in the region, in all three divisions. The SATs always make this a relatively senior-free event. Whose sophomores don’t need more rounds at this point? If they’re coming off great success at Yale, they can have another chance to succeed before being eaten alive at the NYC Invitational. They can amortize the work they’ve done on their Sept-Oct cases. They can get more experience traveling and being housed, with all the maturing benefits that derive therefrom.
It would seem that, looking at the debate calendar, it is sophomores and lightly seasoned juniors who have the fewest opportunities for meaningful rounds throughout the season. Sophomore year is the hardest year of debate, and the one most likely to kill the ambitions of a rising student. This is the year they don’t come back from after continuous defeats at the hand of varsity folks. Sure, for some of them it is a hardening in the forge of competition, but for most of them, it is bleak and unrewarding. And not much fun. They leave forensics and go on to other, more personally rewarding activities. Non-TOCish tournaments allow these younger, less competitive students to enjoy the activity on all fronts.
And it is the non-TOC tournaments, or the not-enough-bids ones, that we are abandoning. Once they are gone, they will not come back. There is no one around here to take their place. Gone will be gone, and maybe their programs will fade along with them. This is not gloom and doom, this is reality.
We do feel that there are some intrinsic issues with the nature of what has hitherto been known as JV or Intermediate debate that should be addressed, and in fact, the meeting of the NYSDCA board last Saturday brought out a basic plan to do so. In effect, it would be the idea of creating a new level of debate and new tournament programs for that level, heavily supported by the NYSDCA and the MHL. But the point now is not to make those proposals. The point is, frankly, to express disappointment with us, as a region, for not supporting ourselves. This needs to change. Dramatically. We all love forensics too much to allow ourselves the luxury of losing programs and tournaments by allowing them to become dispirited.
There is probably nothing we can do to fix Monticello this year. It has lost its PF division entirely, and will run with a small (but we hope productive) LD division and a reasonable Policy division. But there will be other tournaments coming up. We need to support them. All of them.
It’s as simple as that.
Jim Menick, Director of Forensics, Hendrick Hudson High School
Jon Cruz, Director of Forensics, The Bronx High School of Science
We are not quite sure what we are up to these days as a region. On the one hand, we are rich in opportunities for debate. On the other hand, schools are not taking advantage of these opportunities. Schools pick and choose what tournaments to attend based on criteria that are seemingly self-defeating and demonstrably tournament-defeating. No one has anything to gain by this. If tournaments disappear from the schedule, venues that have time and again proven capable of hosting complicated contests over the span of a weekend will disappear, as will their desperately needed fund-raising, and the number of rounds available to everyone else’s students will diminish accordingly.
This is not acceptable.
First of all, as a region, meeting and competing week after week, we have a, dare we say, social contract to support one another. You have your tournament, I have my tournament, we all try to get to all of them. Obviously no one can be in two places at once, but given a choice of place to be, local should be first.
However, that doesn’t seem to be the real issue, i.e., folks traveling great distances to attend tournaments rather than those in the region. The problem instead is simply schools not supporting local events. We believe that every program needs to ask itself if it doesn’t have an obligation to support the programs of its neighbors, often on a reciprocal basis. The reason a team attends a tournament is not so that the hosts will attend the team’s own tournament, but by the same token, if a team does support a given tournament, doesn’t that tournament bear some responsibility in returning that support?
Secondly, the tournaments that seem to be suffering from what we see as neglect are not the powerhouse local tournaments. The tournaments that are hurting usually offer no TOC bids, and are perceived as unappealing to the top varsity debaters in search of those bids. Quite honestly, there is sense to this, that the top varsity debaters would seek competition at their own level, especially those with the talent and drive (and money) to attempt to qualify at the national circuit level. But this is not every debater on a team. An active program with members at every grade level absolutely has students who are not on the TOC trail. Some may be some day; some may never look in that direction. Do we abandon them? Do we believe that because they are not as competitive, they don’t deserve the benefits of forensics? Do any of us really want to live in that world?
Obviously we are referring to the immediate situation of the Monticello tournament, but that tournament is not alone in this. But we’ll stick with that. Monticello has no TOC bids. It is not a tournament that will appeal to a program’s top varsity. But it is a proven tournament, for more years than almost any other event in the region. It is a most hospitable school, year in and year out. And on the flip side, it is a program that actively attends virtually every other tournament in the region. They are there, week in and week out. Their own tournament is capable of being a fantastic opportunity for younger debaters in the region, in all three divisions. The SATs always make this a relatively senior-free event. Whose sophomores don’t need more rounds at this point? If they’re coming off great success at Yale, they can have another chance to succeed before being eaten alive at the NYC Invitational. They can amortize the work they’ve done on their Sept-Oct cases. They can get more experience traveling and being housed, with all the maturing benefits that derive therefrom.
It would seem that, looking at the debate calendar, it is sophomores and lightly seasoned juniors who have the fewest opportunities for meaningful rounds throughout the season. Sophomore year is the hardest year of debate, and the one most likely to kill the ambitions of a rising student. This is the year they don’t come back from after continuous defeats at the hand of varsity folks. Sure, for some of them it is a hardening in the forge of competition, but for most of them, it is bleak and unrewarding. And not much fun. They leave forensics and go on to other, more personally rewarding activities. Non-TOCish tournaments allow these younger, less competitive students to enjoy the activity on all fronts.
And it is the non-TOC tournaments, or the not-enough-bids ones, that we are abandoning. Once they are gone, they will not come back. There is no one around here to take their place. Gone will be gone, and maybe their programs will fade along with them. This is not gloom and doom, this is reality.
We do feel that there are some intrinsic issues with the nature of what has hitherto been known as JV or Intermediate debate that should be addressed, and in fact, the meeting of the NYSDCA board last Saturday brought out a basic plan to do so. In effect, it would be the idea of creating a new level of debate and new tournament programs for that level, heavily supported by the NYSDCA and the MHL. But the point now is not to make those proposals. The point is, frankly, to express disappointment with us, as a region, for not supporting ourselves. This needs to change. Dramatically. We all love forensics too much to allow ourselves the luxury of losing programs and tournaments by allowing them to become dispirited.
There is probably nothing we can do to fix Monticello this year. It has lost its PF division entirely, and will run with a small (but we hope productive) LD division and a reasonable Policy division. But there will be other tournaments coming up. We need to support them. All of them.
It’s as simple as that.
Jim Menick, Director of Forensics, Hendrick Hudson High School
Jon Cruz, Director of Forensics, The Bronx High School of Science
Monday, October 01, 2012
Debate: The MHL Workship 2012
Saturday was a great day.
First of all, there’s something about looking out at that sea of new faces at the beginning of the year. Most of these people are not only here for the first time, they’re here at some new place to learn some new stuff that they really don’t know much about. I’m really proud of the workshop and what it does. We had great attendance, and I think we learned a lot about improving it for next year. I think we also had some great discussion about working with the debate community as a whole, either for the NYSDCA or the MHL, depending on which might be relevant. (And of course there is a lot of overlap between the two.) That’s one of the nice things about this day, the chance for coaches to sit down and talk in a relaxed atmosphere, when we’re not trying to get out a round or whatever. How often does that happen?
I think the biggest takeaway this time out was the need to trim the sessions down to 45 minutes. We just go a tad beyond the traditional attention span, not only for the listeners but for the presenters. We can still cover all the same stuff, just in more, shorter sessions. Simple enough. We also saw a lot of benefit in the solid local seniors working with the young ’uns that we want to develop, and I’ll talk about that separately some time this week. In the event, in any case, how sweet is it that one of the top debaters in the region and one of the rising debaters with the most potential to become likewise, staged the demo round? And, of course, no one paid for any of it. Good stuff.
My sessions were, first, the parents. Quite a good turnout, which surprised me. I went through the hoo-ha of what to expect at tournaments and why we need them to help out and all that, and then walked them through PF, which nowadays is mostly where they’ll land. I do sort of think that the age of the LD parent judge is fading away, if it hasn’t already.
The next session was O’C and I and the Monk (this is why there’s a glossary, people) going over the life with the new coaches, of which there was quite a large number. We talked about what tournaments were the best to try, the skinny on the Ivies, invitationals, travel, housing, etc. When I was a new coach, I pretty much had to figure out things on my own. I also had to register for everything by snail mail. Times have changed for the better.
Then we met, i.e., the NYSDCA, and discussed all sorts of business. As I said, I’ll relay that here over the next few days.
The final session was the most fun. Kaz and I were going to do separate sessions with the noobs to brainstorm the Modest Novice topic, but given the numbers that were left at the time, we decided to pool our resources. Hence we did an ad hoc team leadership deal that was absolutely great. We complemented one another’s thinking, while meanwhile keeping a reasonable amount of control on the group (i.e., the usual number of people who always have their hands up versus the others who need to be recognized if they even blink). Anyone who was in that session and is debating next week at the first-timers’ got a really good leg up. And Sheryl and I had a ball doing it. Almost as much fun as the DiDeAd. But not quite.
First of all, there’s something about looking out at that sea of new faces at the beginning of the year. Most of these people are not only here for the first time, they’re here at some new place to learn some new stuff that they really don’t know much about. I’m really proud of the workshop and what it does. We had great attendance, and I think we learned a lot about improving it for next year. I think we also had some great discussion about working with the debate community as a whole, either for the NYSDCA or the MHL, depending on which might be relevant. (And of course there is a lot of overlap between the two.) That’s one of the nice things about this day, the chance for coaches to sit down and talk in a relaxed atmosphere, when we’re not trying to get out a round or whatever. How often does that happen?
I think the biggest takeaway this time out was the need to trim the sessions down to 45 minutes. We just go a tad beyond the traditional attention span, not only for the listeners but for the presenters. We can still cover all the same stuff, just in more, shorter sessions. Simple enough. We also saw a lot of benefit in the solid local seniors working with the young ’uns that we want to develop, and I’ll talk about that separately some time this week. In the event, in any case, how sweet is it that one of the top debaters in the region and one of the rising debaters with the most potential to become likewise, staged the demo round? And, of course, no one paid for any of it. Good stuff.
My sessions were, first, the parents. Quite a good turnout, which surprised me. I went through the hoo-ha of what to expect at tournaments and why we need them to help out and all that, and then walked them through PF, which nowadays is mostly where they’ll land. I do sort of think that the age of the LD parent judge is fading away, if it hasn’t already.
The next session was O’C and I and the Monk (this is why there’s a glossary, people) going over the life with the new coaches, of which there was quite a large number. We talked about what tournaments were the best to try, the skinny on the Ivies, invitationals, travel, housing, etc. When I was a new coach, I pretty much had to figure out things on my own. I also had to register for everything by snail mail. Times have changed for the better.
Then we met, i.e., the NYSDCA, and discussed all sorts of business. As I said, I’ll relay that here over the next few days.
The final session was the most fun. Kaz and I were going to do separate sessions with the noobs to brainstorm the Modest Novice topic, but given the numbers that were left at the time, we decided to pool our resources. Hence we did an ad hoc team leadership deal that was absolutely great. We complemented one another’s thinking, while meanwhile keeping a reasonable amount of control on the group (i.e., the usual number of people who always have their hands up versus the others who need to be recognized if they even blink). Anyone who was in that session and is debating next week at the first-timers’ got a really good leg up. And Sheryl and I had a ball doing it. Almost as much fun as the DiDeAd. But not quite.
More articles we didn't finish reading
These headlines are all real, directly copied from our RSS feed without editing. When we say we didn't read them, we mean it. They didn't exactly pull us in, for some reason...
- What’s the Difference Between Life and Death?
- Here's what it's like to swim in a feeding frenzy of 100 sharks
- Mr. Peanut’s lasting impact on Vancouver
- Justin Bieber Threw Up On Stage In Arizona
- Don't Be Afraid Of Opera - It's Just Like Baseball
- Cat Sings Star Wars Theme Song [Video]
K-Pop
I've posted a lot of K-Pop in the past. I sort of feel that this stuff is beyond criticism, which may be why I'm intrigued by it.
Let's move over to BoingBoing for a great post from them with lots of videos. Post-"Gangnam Style," America wakes up to K-pop
Let's move over to BoingBoing for a great post from them with lots of videos. Post-"Gangnam Style," America wakes up to K-pop
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)