Showing posts with label dance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dance. Show all posts

Saturday, July 20, 2013

All those years of dance lessons for this?



Dangerous Minds suggests that this is the worst Star Wars video we'll ever see. I certainly hope so.

Thursday, July 19, 2012

Dance: Or is the category Robots?



Another reason to get a robot.

It does go on a bit too long, but then again, the amazing thing is that it goes on at all.

Via.

Monday, July 09, 2012

Bollywood

First, watch this:



I found this via Dangerous Minds. It's been a while since I looked at any Indian film. But there was a time when I was mildly enraptured by it. In the 70s, India became the number one producer of movies in the world (although I don't think that's true anymore), and it was the ultra-commercial Bombay Hindi film machine that one mostly saw. (Bollywood is a portmanteau word combining Bombay and Hollywood.) The movies were inevitably big and bright, and as chaste as you can imagine, especially compared to Hollywood in the 70s. And they were highly melodramatic, chock-filled with just about everything you can think of, and quite long. There was an Indian cinema on 57th Street in NYC; it was worth the trip once in a while. It was not just a whole new world, i.e. India, but a whole new style of movies.

Of course, the clip above does sort of bother me, only because, I'm sorry, that's not dancing, that's moving in synch, which is what passes these days for dance with the likes of Madonna and her musical children/imitators. Dance is not just moving your arms a lot and shaking your booty and moving left and right in unison with everyone else. But, well, where are the real dancers nowadays that can do that sort of thing right, that anyone wants to see? I posted some contemporary tap last week; I can't see those folks on stage with Lady Gaga.

I don't know if I would recommend your watching a lot of Bollywood films, but it's nice to be aware of them, and to sample them on YouTube. Sometimes you'll think that the action is positively senseless and crazy; that's because it is senseless and crazy. And fun. Which is not a bad thing for movies to be.
.

Monday, July 02, 2012

Tap 2

Jason Samuels Smith was cited in the Sunday Times this week, and in the picture he sort of reminded me of Glover, so I thought I'd take a look at his work. I found this:



Okay. Frighteningly good. And what was this Stockholm Tap thing all about? I found some more:





Okay, this next one is only tap in the broadest sense, but it's fun.



The history of tap very much includes challenge dancing. Here's the pros comparing (foot) notes:



The history of tap? I mean, you watch all of the above, and with the exception of the Charleston, it's as modern as today's jazz (with which tap has always been inextricably linked). Always? Here's three greats of the past, having at each other, including a little trash talk on the streets to get into the mood.



If you start searching for these folks on YouTube, and you have any fondness for dance, you may never return.

Tap

I won't say too much. Go to the article by Judith Mackrell, read it and watch the videos. She tries to analyze a couple of pieces by Savion Glover and Fred Astaire. Whether this is truly possible is hard to say, at least in these clips. Glover is a live performer, while Astaire is a movie dancer, and it's hard to separate a little film trickery from what's happening. But I guess, ultimately, it's all about the dancing. You can draw your own conclusions, but please do watch these clips. Radically different, they are both as good as it gets.
.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Frederick Austerlitz

He was born May 10, 1899. Was a kid in a brother-sister act in vaudeville, and broke big in the theater. Rumor has it that Adele was the real star of the act, and he almost quit after she quit the act to get married.

Introducing Fred to the movies: It's hard to believe he didn't immediately pack up and leave Hollywood after this, his film debut, but fortunately for us, he stuck it out. Key thing: look at how his head is held up at all times, and how she keeps looking at either his feet or her feet. That's not acting; that's being Joan Crawford in a dance number with Fred Astaire.

His best partner? Some say it was the one with whom he made it to the top:



But, obviously, this was his best partner, if you're just talking about dancing skill:



If you go to 2:34 in this clip, you'll see one of the last times he ever danced on film. Watch it without a tear in your eye, if you can. Coppola knew how to frame an exit. (Fred did do a little more hoofing in That's Entertainment Part 2, but it wasn't quite the same. It was sort of fun, though.)

We can say, with complete certainty, that there will never again be anyone like Fred Astaire. The world in which he could arise is long gone. No one will ever dance that way again. No one could. Thank God for movies, and the fact that we can still watch him whenever we want.
.







Monday, April 02, 2012

Honi Coles

As Arlene Croce said about Fred Astaire, he could tap, but he wasn't one of the all-time great tap dancers. That distinction goes to a handful of others; prominent among these is Charles "Honi" Coles, born on April 2, 1911.

We are blessed, first, with film of much of the art of the 20th Century, and second, easy access to all that film in the 21st. I don't have to say anything about the amazing elegant Mr. Coles, or the speedy music of his feet. You can see it for yourself. This clip is about 8 minutes long, and you're not going to be able to tear yourself away, so set aside those few minutes to savor:

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

The unique Fred Astaire

Whatever it was that he did, he was the only major movie star of the studio era—perhaps of any era—to have had the career his talent meant him to have, and to have had it as long as he liked.

Dance critic Arlene Croce is the author of the indispensible The Fred Astaire & Ginger Rogers Book. Perhaps because she understands dance so well, she understands Fred Astaire. It's not just that she can discuss his style and appreciate what he did, but she can explain why. Astaire was unique. Although he was a child of Vaudeville and Broadway, it was in movies that he found his metier. He invented Fred Astaire as a movie performer:

What Astaire produced was himself, in all his variety—as soloist, as partner, as singer, as actor, as instrumentalist (piano, drums). He choreographed all his own numbers, usually with the assistance of his near double Hermes Pan; he supervised the filming and cutting; and before choreographing a number he worked out its whole musical structure... In short, wherever you looked in the musical as opposed to the scenic and dramatic process, you found Astaire.

Ostensibly in They’re the Top Croce is reviewing two books, one on Fred and one on his career with his sister Adele. She takes the opportunity to dissect the two, and to write an extremely informative piece, even to someone who knows Astaire backwards and forwards. Read it, if you have any interest in the art of film, the art of music, or the art of dance (or in Fred Astaire's case, the art of all three put together).

And here's Fred dancing solo in Flying Down to Rio in 1933:

Thursday, March 08, 2012

Cyd Charisse

Born on this date in 1922, the dancer had a wonderful quote about Kelly and Astaire, her two most famous partners: "It's like comparing apples and oranges. They're both delicious."

We could post all sorts of videos of Charisse and either of these partners, or others, but since she appeared in one particular scene that has never been surpassed in the history of musicals, there's no point to it. This one says it all: