Thursday, June 04, 2015

In which we contemplate the end of a league


Updating my tournament schedule has been way more time-consuming than I expected. First of all, I had to desailorize it, and I kept missing stuff. Then I had to decide whether to include the unlikelies, like any MHLs. Then there was the random links listing in the left-hand column. Again, the MHL loomed large.

Whither the MHL?

It’s a great story. The Mid-Hudson League was established back in the dark ages by, among others, Malcolm Bump. Sodikow was either there at the start or close thereto. I’m fuzzy on the participation of some of the other early folks but there were a few others. The point of the organization was to provide a training league, a place where first- and second-years could debate one another and learn and grow. That’s a perennial issue, rounds for newbies. Nowadays we seem to have plenty of novice LD opportunities at invitationals, but novice PF is rare, although the rationale for offering it is exactly the same as LD. JV has virtually disappeared from invitationals, aside from Yale and those valiant few persisting with Academy. (Come to think of it, Academy knocked Monticello’s numbers back up a bit, so maybe it will continue. Back in the day, Monti had a full JV division in addition to it’s Varsity division.) In any case, the idea of regular rounds for younger students remains a good one. As the geographic center of the MHL shifted, it was renamed the Metro-Hudson League, thus acknowledging, at least subtly, the active participation of the Newark folks.

And then it got the vapors.

It wasn’t hard over the last few years to see that MHLs weren’t pulling them in as they once had. And last year, we reached the point of canceling most of them for lack of interest.

I have no idea what happened. Debate per se is bigger than ever, it seems. Policy may not be robust, but PF more than makes up for it. And we continue to have strong LD schools, albeit with a native circuit bent, although, still, people have to start somewhere. I’ve heard various theories about the falling off, but given that the league is virtually free, it can’t be economic, and it can’t be the content of the rounds because it’s the same folks that go to the invitationals, and it can’t be the travel time (although that’s perhaps one of the best explanations) because around here people go to, say, Texas at the drop of a hat, so going to the next county over can’t be that much of a hardship. Granted, the NYC Debate league offers a full buffet of events during the year that satisfies their needs, but they didn’t exist except for a few policy folks back in the day so you can’t say that the focus has simply shifted from the suburbs to the urbs. People just stopped coming. Go figure.

I probably haven’t made it specifically clear to too many people that I intend to have nothing to do with organizing the MHL next year. That’s another reason for wanting to retire: I just didn’t want to face the frustration of trying to rebuild the organization, or find a different way to satisfy what I see as a need for educational rounds. If I don’t do it, I don’t know who will. The “board,” so to speak, was myself, Cruz, Kaz and Militza from NJUDL. I don’t expect M to do it herself; Jersey is already full up with NJUDLs. And Kaz is in Massachusetts and Cruz is gone and I’m bowing out.

Mother of mercy, is this the end of the MHL? 

No comments: