I never care so much about prognosticating the debatable aspects of topics
so much as the educational aspects, although one or two here have, at least to
me, no debate grist whatsoever. In any case, I find five good ones and five
not good ones.
Resolved: In the United States, workers ought to have a
civil right to unionize.
Don’t they, via the NLRB? Anyhow, the point would be whether
they ought to, not if they already do. Given the service economy we’re heading
into, it seems a little stale to me in terms of timeliness. Figures show unions
are dying out, and about 11% of workers are still in them. Education time
should be better spent elsewhere. Thumbs down.
Resolved: The non-therapeutic use of human enhancement
technologies is immoral.
This would be fun, albeit a little silly. It will play to
debaters’ worst instincts, but at least they’ll have to learn about what’s
happening in the science. Thumbs slightly down.
Resolved: The United States ought to provide a universal
basic income.
Yes. One of my favorites. I love the idea of imagining how
far gov obs extend in the modern post-industrial age. Thumbs up.
Resolved: Plea bargaining ought to be abolished in the
United States criminal justice system.
This one is crazy to me. Practically all cases are pled out,
and my understanding is that this removes endless court time and costs. I
understand the issue of innocent people pressured into pleading, but if that’s
what we want to talk about, that’s hardly a general principle on which to build
action. Thumbs down.
Resolved: In the United States, reporters ought to have the
right to protect the identity of confidential sources.
Interesting, and I think meaty. Thumbs up.
Resolved: A democracy ought to require the separation of
church and state.
I like the idea of students studying the meaning of
religion, and how it informs society. As a debate, people might think the neg
has no ground because we’re all so liberal-biased, but there are plenty of
people out there who strongly believe gov should be operated by religious
principles. Thumbs up.
Resolved: In the United States, non-human animals ought to
have legally protected rights.
Yeah, okay. Not to put too fine a point on it, this was the imaginary topic I came up with in the original Nostrum. I meant
it as satire. Thumbs down.
Resolved: Wealthy nations have an obligation to provide
development assistance to other nations.
Yes, please. Let’s study this one. Thumbs up.
Resolved: Privileged individuals ought not appropriate the
culture of a marginalized group.
This could be the worse on the list. While we should be learning
about privilege and appropriation and marginalization, they are not strong
contenders for balanced debate. I mean, who in their right mind would want to
flip neg, given that the neg says the privileged individuals ought to
appropriate the culture of a marginalized group? Seriously? Thumbs down.
Resolved: The United States’ use of targeted killing in
foreign countries is unjust.
Sure. Worth discussion, and probably ground for both sides. Thumbs
up.
Once again the committee has come up with a diverse and interesting group of topics, and once again they have gone out into the world as they've deliberated and listened to the opinions of the community at large. That is the way it should be. Good work, all.
///